Friday, September 28, 2007

Queens reborn: For better or for worse?

Don't know if you've seen it yet, but there is a new photoblog dedicated to the Queens McMansion:

Queens Reborn: For Better or For Worse

Needs to tweak the layout a bit, but otherwise, it showcases a fine collection of crap.


Anonymous said...

alot of those pictures out of date, you should see how they look completed! ay!

Anonymous said...

Wow... I don't even know what to say. That web site could serve as an electronic brochure for the Queens School of Architecture and Design (Q-SAD). Just proves that money can't buy you taste. Thank you for sharing. That made my day. I needed a good laugh. :)

Anonymous said...

For worse! Most don't even have landscaping, lawns, trees, and the building materials are shoddy. Stucco in massive quantities was never meant for the northeast, and will show signs of weathering in a few years to come. Whatever happened to "Love Thy Neighbor?" A cancer is spreading in Malba. HELP!!!

verdi said...


Malba is already terminal !

Thank the Don Cheechos!

Anonymous said...

this is why Queens has a bad name. When people say the word 'Queens,' it is synonymous with 'tacky.' This is also why Queens will never be as desirable as Brooklyn.

mazeartist said...

A blog that is 100% crap architecture. I lost my appetite. (gotta get my barf bag now)