Friday, June 22, 2012
Lancman calls for eminent domain at St. Saviour's
From The Forum:
Assemblyman Rory Lancman stepped into the City Council district of one of his rivals Thursday to advocate the use of eminent domain to buy the former St. Saviour’s Church property in Maspeth.
For more than five years, neighbors and parkland advocates have lobbied the city to turn the boarded-up property into parkland. It’s currently a dirt lot with a warehouse tucked in a corner.
Last week, Lancman and a few backers took the chance to criticize Councilwoman Elizabeth Crowley and the Department of Parks and Recreation saying they have failed to serve the neighborhood’s needs.
“What we’re looking at behind us is not just an eyesore and a terrible waste of resources, but a physical representation of a monumental failure on the part of government to take care of the needs of this community,” Lancman said, standing in front of plywood fencing surrounding the 1.5-acre lot.
Lancman is competing in a Democratic primary for the 6th District congressional seat against Crowley and Assemblywoman Grace Meng.
For the past few years, the owner of the property was unwilling tosell the land despite the $3.5 million dedicated to the prospect from Crowley and Queens Borough President Helen Marshall.
When Crowley pulled her portion of that funding and the Parks Department dropped its bid for the plan in November, some activists were furious.
Lancman cashed in on that sore spot by calling the press conference Thursday.
“The long and short of it is there was a window of opportunity when the city could have purchased this property and turned it into a park,” Lancman said. “And through a series of mistakes and omissions and just bad judgment the city failed to do so.”
Mirroring the call of about eight parks advocates and neighbors behind him, Lancman said acquiring this parkland would be a textbook case in which to use eminent domain despite its abuses elsewhere.
He pledged he would use the political leverage available to him to influence the city’s hand if he’s elected to Congress.
He also said he wouldn’t rule out using eminent domain on a federal level to claim the area as United States parkland.
From the Queens Chronicle:
Crowley’s campaign declined to comment, but wearing her City Council hat she has said numerous times that eminent domain could be troublesome for a number of reasons, including the fact that the city is authorized to pay no more than the appraised $5 million for the parcel.
She has warned that legal fees, the cost of also acquiring and knocking down the existing warehouse on the site and other things could push the cost millions higher.
Critics at the press conference expressed certainty that Maspeth Development Corp., which has been asking a reported $7 million for the site, intentionally threw up the warehouse in a deliberate effort to jack up the price.
Posted by Queens Crapper at 12:25 AM
Labels: eminent domain, parks, Rory Lancman, St. Saviour's
And a recall vote for that lying slut
"As of right" they could build a warehouse. Because of the exodus of manufacturing from Queens that started in the 1940's, millions of square feet of warehouse space is available in Queens and a much of that in Maspeth. The idea that a new warehouse could turn a profit has always been a joke. It is a placeholder to maintain the purchase price.
You are correct Mr. Lancman! This is the way eminent domain is supposed to be used but it doesn't surprise me that Crowley would have a laundry list of excuses why she can't do anything. A similar situation exits in Whitestone and the current councilman, Halloran, ran a laundry list of reasons, such as there are already enough parks in Queens. Good luck after you win the primary!
Funny Halloran said he would do the same thing for St, Saviour and the CYO site in Whitestone.
Well if he wins the primary, and promises the same for us in Whitestone, who knows? He may very well win the whole thing.
Hallorans rants against the CYO in Whitestone were featured here when he lied by implying that virgin land needed to be remediated. I believe he had an argument on Facebook with civic leader Al Centola about this parcel.
Halloran came up with a lot of BS during that rant. Good article led me to find it and read the whole thing. Lost all respect for Halloran once I realized what a conniving turd he turned out to be.
#5....would you clarify these words "implying that virgin land needed to be REMEDIATED"....."good article led me to find it and read the whole thing". can you detail this article ? for the Q.C.
your comment is a bit garbled .sources lead to credibility.
He's talking about this.
Thank you crappy.
The councilman said repeatedly that the land (which for years was an outdoor tennis court) "needed to be remediated" as if the land were a dump in the past.
Thanks for the link
Halloran is a liar
Thanks Al for calling him out on his bullsht
Sources clarify things a little for you?
Post a Comment