Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Outside CitiField


Why we not only allowed Citicorp to keep the naming rights to the stadium but also gave them the green light to put their annoying logo on top of it boggles the mind. The early renderings did not reveal this.

How pissed off would you be if you spent $400 on a brick and they installed it upside-down?

A bunch of great Mets moments - none of which ever happened at CitiField. But a nice touch.

11 comments:

Jason in Kew Gardens said...

"How pissed off would you be if you spent $400 on a brick and they installed it upside-down?"

Ha! What about the $400,000,000 we were all fleeced of for that sign?

Hahahaha!

Anonymous said...

Wow you are a nitpicker. I was at the new park on Sunday and overall it was great. As for the brick, they are all in the ground. If mine were upside down, I would think that would be pretty cool because it would stand out. It's not like it's on a wall, you walk on them.

Anonymous said...

mets suck

Anonymous said...

Crapper likes to complain about nothing

When U Hire on Roosevelt said...

I doughin no wha yr tooken abou. He tel me put de breeck in so I doin, no?

I Remember the Culprit said...

Sure, you are the guy wearing the 17th Annual Leguna Serfing Contest T-Shirt from 1971.

Anonymous said...

...Leguna Serfing Contest T-Shirt from 1971.

You mean Leguna Serfing Coontest T-shart?

When U Hire on Roosevelt said...

yea, das de wonnin.

Anonymous said...

I'm so sorry Crapper, just knock it down then! jeez, move on with your life.

Anonymous said...

Someone's a little sensitive about criticism of a ballpark being subsidized with taxpayer money.

Anonymous said...

Oh my god, I never thought of it that way! You're right fellow taxpayer! There is, after all, so much we can do about this too! I'm going to write a letter! yeah, that will do something! Look how much its done in the past! Wow! Democracy!