If you want a comprehensive summary of the tweeding that took place at Willets Point and/or would like to read about the future problems the plan faces, visit Noticing New York's 4 part series on the issue. You will learn a lot about this plan that you may not have realized and wonder about all the questions that the City won't and can't answer.
Saturday, December 6, 2008
Recommended reading
If you want a comprehensive summary of the tweeding that took place at Willets Point and/or would like to read about the future problems the plan faces, visit Noticing New York's 4 part series on the issue. You will learn a lot about this plan that you may not have realized and wonder about all the questions that the City won't and can't answer.
13 comments:
No one in this forum will read that.
Their attention spans dont allow reading more than 100 words at a time.
Regardless, the piece is written by an avowed opponent to the development and does not represent a fair and balanced "comprehensive summary"
I'm sorry, I guess we should stick to reading Queens weeklies and EDC press releases for fair and balanced coverage.
The author of this piece has written a scholarly analysis and is not being paid by either side, so it's as fair as it can be.
"Noticing New York is an independent entity dedicated to the proposition that developing New York and appreciating New York go hand in hand."
How dare he write about this!
Anonymous Number One:
Tell us the precise nature of information that you believe is missing from the analysis, which you claim results in the analysis being something other than fair and balanced.
Anonymous said...
No one in this forum will read that.
Their attention spans dont allow reading more than 100 words at a time.
Regardless, the piece is written by an avowed opponent to the development and does not represent a fair and balanced "comprehensive summary
ASS HOLE BIGGE CARLOS DONT WORRY I .J . WILL BE HEAR IN A WEEK OR TO AND THEY'LL READ IT AND OVER TURN WILLETS POINT
carlos is anonymous again
Tell us the precise nature of information that you believe is missing from the analysis
I never said anything was "missing" persay.
The author at the beginning says clearly that they are against the development and then goes on to make assumptions that have no basis in fact other than their own spin.
I could go into them but what use since - as I said - no one in this forum will bother to read the Noticing New York piece.
I guess we should stick to reading Queens weeklies and EDC press releases for fair and balanced coverage
the author relies on many of those same sources as you scorn.
The author of this piece has written a scholarly analysis and is not being paid by either side, so it's as fair as it can be
Just because it is done without fee does not mean it is fair and balanced. As YOU can attest.
is david lambino working week ends for the edc? wow you mean pinsky gave him some work to do? i thought all he did was write blogs all day to try and sway opinions . crapper you should make it a rule that it shows up what everyones name is so we can stop this biggie smalls-carlos-edc bullshi-
95% of the comments here are anonymous.
"the author relies on many of those same sources as you scorn."
Exactly my point.
"Just because it is done without fee does not mean it is fair and balanced."
I merely mentioned that it was a comprehensive summary of the tweeding. I'd rather trust a non-EDC urban planner to give me the real deal than Biggie Smalls or Robert Lieber.
I read all of it. It confirms my belief that prospective WP development is one of the worst, most politically tainted land grabs in recent memory. Wilpons comments about a soccer stadium reinforces that fact. I dont know how a person could believe in the notion of private property and still think its ok to hear statements from the Mayor and private developers about what is going to happen to property they dont own.
Mayor Hugo Bloomberg can kiss my ass.
I read all of it. It confirms my belief that prospective WP development is one of the worst, most politically tainted land grabs in recent memory. Wilpons comments about a soccer stadium reinforces that fact. I dont know how a person could believe in the notion of private property and still think its ok to hear statements from the Mayor and private developers about what is going to happen to property they dont own.
Mayor Hugo Bloomberg can kiss my ass.
Sunday, December 07,
amen!!!! you hear that biggie carlos smalls or mr lambino ? thats what its about some people still have morals you scum
Post a Comment