Showing posts with label soda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label soda. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Bloomberg wants soda ban to be statewide

From the NY Post:

Mayor Bloomberg today called on the state to follow the city's lead by banning the sale of sugary sodas in sizes larger than 16 ounces in all stores, not just restaurants.

The city's new law takes effect March 12 in food establishments regulated by the Health Department.

Supermarkets, groceries and shops where prepared foods constitute less than 50 percent of sales are not affected because they're overseen by the state Agriculture Department and the city doesn't have jurisdiction.

Individual pizza parlors would have to obey the new law, even when it comes to deliveries.

"You have exactly the right question, but you're asking it the wrong way," the mayor said.At a press conference today, the mayor was asked why pizza shops shouldn't be in the same category as supermarkets, where customers would still be able to walk out with all the two-liter soda bottles they could carry.

"Keep in mind we're trying to save the lives of these kids, particularly kids...The state should do exactly the same thing in stores."

Friday, February 15, 2013

2nd Open Letter to the City Council of New York Sent To All Members


February 5, 2013

Dear Council Members:

I had recently written to each and every one of you regarding your inaction with respect to the Mayor’s unilateral ban on sweetened drinks larger than 16 ounces. Council Member Halloran was kind enough to provide me with a well-written letter signed by himself and 13 members of the City Council and sent to Mayor Bloomberg on June 1, 2012 protesting the enactment of the ban. To those of you that signed this letter, I applaud your stand for freedom. To those of you who failed to sign that letter, your silence is resounding. Council Members Peter Vallone and Mark Weprin responded to my letter citing that the soda ban was outside of the auspices of the City Council, which now leads me to address a few pieces of legislation for which your chamber is responsible.

Several years ago, Council Member Vallone, in some misguided effort to address the graffiti epidemic, sponsored legislation which sought to penalize the owners of certain property types for failing to remove graffiti from their property within 30 days. I thought for sure that no majority on the City Council would lack common sense and fairness enough to pass such an idiotic bill. I was wrong. That bill became law and is now on our books as the only law in this state, of which I am aware, that punishes the victim of a crime. What right does the City Council have to add insult to the injury that a property owner suffers after realizing that some lowlife spray painted his property? This law is repugnant to both reason and justice. While the City now provides free graffiti removal, the very fact that a DOB inspector could issue a violation against that owner each and any time the City’s coffers get low is simply unacceptable to the people of the City of New York. There is no way that a majority of the citizens of the city would ever pass such an unjust law and this law should be repealed.

The second piece of ridiculous legislation enacted by your chamber, among many, is the law which subjects a law abiding citizen to a summons for being in a playground without the accompaniment of a child. Some genius in your ranks thought it proper to prohibit 100% of law abiding citizens from sitting in a playground because a fraction of 1% might be pedophiles. Decapitation is a certain cure for a headache but intelligent people would never employ it as such. And, yes, in your defense, there are some citizens that buy into the fear-mongering that our media and politicians have fostered. However, there is simply no way that a majority of citizens in this city would ever pass this law.

The problem is that most of you do not care about the majority of the citizens of New York City. You made that very clear when you committed the greatest betrayal of public trust in my lifetime by overriding not one, but two, citizen referenda limiting the term limits of city officials to two. Those of you that voted to extend those term limits are a disgrace to office and to call yourself a representative is laughable. You don’t represent the citizens of this great city; you represent the tyranny of Bloomberg. You should have been voted out of office as the traitors that you are, shameless cowards who have no respect for the will of the people that you purportedly represent. Who would have thought that the greatest threat to our democracy would come from within? And perhaps your betrayal would not have been so bad if it weren’t in favor of a non-New Yorker who has committed the most prolific assault on individual liberty that this great city has ever known; a man who was willing to forsake the tragedy of people losing their homes to Hurricane Sandy so that he could watch a marathon go forward. We all know it was not political pressure or his sense of right and wrong that prevailed upon Mayor Bloomberg but rather the fast-growing reality that he would face the violent wrath of angry Staten Island residents if he allowed it to proceed. It is to that bully whom a majority of you have shamefully pledged your allegiance. Not even Rudy got a third term after 9/11, the only time in our history it could arguably have been warranted.

To Members Quinn, Vallone and Co. who now seek the higher offices of mayor, borough president or comptroller, who violated the greatest mandate of true democracy, the referendum, and who supported the assault on individual liberty, do the people of this city a favor and get out of government. An elected person who enacts legislation restricting individual rights that would not be passed by a majority of the citizens is no representative at all but rather a rogue politician who has an agenda other than what is best for the citizens they purport to represent. Perhaps your efforts would have been better served making sure that neighborhoods, such as my old Astoria, did not become vertically overgrown such that the character is no longer cognizable as a neighborhood. Instead, you arrogantly helped yourselves and King Bloomberg to a third term. In any event, your kind is not suitable to represent the citizens of New York.

We, the people, need leaders who are willing to stand up for the citizens they represent and lie down in front of an earth-moving machine when the government, local, state, or federal, seeks to take a portion of Flushing-Meadow Park or Willets Point under some misguided notion of “eminent domain.” We do not need leaders who pander to developers to have their picture taken when the ground is broken. That is not leadership; it is sellout. Individual rights must be restored and both the private and public property of the citizens of New York must never be allowed to be taken for any private purpose, period. As I said in my first letter, I will do all to awaken the Patrick Henry in each of my fellow citizens so that they will remember how you violated the will of the people four years ago and send you packing in November. And if you happen to win, you shall remain imposters.

Sincerely,

William J. Cariello III

Monday, November 19, 2012

Priorities, people!

From the Times Ledger:

An open letter to the City Council:

I had written to my city councilman, Dan Halloran (R-Whitestone), about my family’s experience at the AMC Bay Terrace movie theater that was doing a trial run of the law which is to go into effect next March.

I thought it only fair to address each of you with respect to Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s revision of the city health law to prohibit the sale of larger-than-l6-ounce sweetened sodas. Although my granduncle, Mario J. Cariello, was the Queens borough president from 1963-69, I have never thought it necessary to write to a public official until now.

I need to know from each of you how you could sit by while a tyrannical mayor promulgated a law that restricts the most basic of the personal freedoms of your constituents: their personal diet. I can no longer go on like my apathetic, sleepwalking fellow citizens who I see reading about the soda ban in the local papers and plodding on like everything is okay.

Everything is not okay. Our founding fathers fought for the freedoms your chamber watched get taken away from the citizens of New York City at the suggestion of a mayor and the rubber stamp of eight members of the city Department of Health. All of this was done without any semblance of a democratic process. In so doing, they restricted my ability, as a 5-foot-7, 165-pound person, to purchase a large Coke Classic to share with my family.


It goes on and on.

Now my point in posting this excerpt is not that this chap is wrong, but that this apparently lifelong resident of Queens "never thought it necessary to write to a public official until now." So he didn't give much of a care about term limits being extended, had no opinion on any of the many development projects being proposed in his own backyard, didn't mind being left buried in snow for 2 weeks, etc., but only found the gumption to rip the City Council a new one when his ability to purchase an oversized beverage at a movie theater was limited.

This, my friends, is the problem with the people who live in Queens.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Council members surprised kids don't take gym in school


From the Daily News:

City Council members Monday grilled the city’s health commissioner over Mayor Bloomberg’s planned supersized-soda ban, with one arguing that restoring cut gym classes would be a better way to combat obesity.

By the city’s estimate, about 40% of public school students are overweight or obese — part of the evidence the Bloomberg administration cites as justification in its latest push to reverse the obesity trend.

Yet as city lawmakers from two committees quizzed city Health Commissioner Thomas Farley, Brooklyn Councilman Domenic Recchia said his children don’t get required physical education in city schools.

In fact, when the city controller’s office reviewed 31 elementary schools last year, it found that none offered physical education classes required under state law.

“If obesity is so important, why is gym being cut?” Recchia asked.


Are these people serious? The City Council funds the construction of school extensions which are built on top of schoolyards and knows that gyms are subdivided into classrooms and then they wonder out loud why kids aren't exercising in school? These people are the problem, not the solution.

And check out these same council members stuffing their faces with junk food during a hearing about banning soda...

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Nanny Bloomberg at it again


From the NY Times:

New York City plans to enact a far-reaching ban on the sale of large sodas and other sugary drinks at restaurants, movie theaters and street carts, in the most ambitious effort yet by the Bloomberg administration to combat rising obesity.

The proposed ban would affect virtually the entire menu of popular sugary drinks found in delis, fast-food franchises and even sports arenas, from energy drinks to pre-sweetened iced teas. The sale of any cup or bottle of sweetened drink larger than 16 fluid ounces — about the size of a medium coffee, and smaller than a common soda bottle — would be prohibited under the first-in-the-nation plan, which could take effect as soon as next March.

The measure would not apply to diet sodas, fruit juices, dairy-based drinks like milkshakes, or alcoholic beverages; it would not extend to beverages sold in grocery or convenience stores.

Sunday, January 24, 2010

New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes

Good morning,

Governor Paterson’s new budget proposal, yesterday, included a tax on sugar sweetened beverages of 12 cents per 12-ounce can.

According to New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes, this tax would be more than 9 times higher on a 12 pack of non-alcoholic beverages, like soft drinks, than the state tax on a 12 pack of alcoholic beverages, like beer, and would increase the cost of a two liter bottle of soda by nearly 68 cents.

Consumers and retailers will feel the impact of a tax of this magnitude on a daily basis given the still grim economic picture, and we wanted to ask your readers to join the fight against this unfair tax at www.nobeveragetax.com, by signing a petition to let Governor Paterson and State Representatives know that they will not bear the responsibility of fixing Albany.

You can also view a recent press release from New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes here.

Feel free to contact me with any questions.

Best regards,

Rob Longert for to New Yorkers Against Unfair Taxes

Monday, September 28, 2009

Dr. not buying Bloomberg's anti-soda campaign


Good afternoon,

I hope you’re doing well. I recently read a post on your blog titled, “Do What I Say, Not What I Do” where you address Mayor Bloomberg’s hypocrisy towards the New York City Health Department’s “Don’t Drink Yourself Fat” advertisement. I thought you might be interested in a podcast with a response to the ad campaign, from the scientific perspective. Dr. Elizabeth Whelan, President of the American Council on Science and Health, thinks it is irresponsible to pinpoint a single product for America’s obesity problem and thinks that these efforts may be misleading for consumers.

She addresses her views on the podcast below:

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Liz Seymour for Dr. Elizabeth Whelan and the American Council on Science and Health