How can SCA, with a straight
face, claim that they considered sites #1 and #2 as alternatives to the Maspeth site when they are already building 2 other schools on them?
Why have they not informed anyone that they have a potential alternative site at #3, which is half the size of the Maspeth site?
Why did they publicly claim that they investigated other suggested sites in West Maspeth but they do not list them here?
Why have they not made this document public? (Someone snapped a photo of it at a hearing on the desk of SCA's attorney who refused to provide a copy.)
Why did they tell the City Council last year that they did not plan to use eminent domain this year to build schools when they are trying to do just that?