Panorama of New York

Now THIS is a cool photography website.

Willets Point Council hearing update

CITY COUNCIL GRILLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRESIDENT LIEBER ON WILLETS POINT REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL

Council Members Oppose Use of Eminent Domain

At a City Council oversight hearing at City Hall Thursday on the city's proposed redevelopment plan for Willets Point, members of the City Council's Economic Development and Land Use Committees grilled NYC Economic Development Corporation's (EDC) President Robert Lieber on the city's plans to use eminent domain to condemn and seize over 40 acres of private properties in Willets Point, Queens. The city would then sell the land to a developer for a sizable profit.

When questioned, EDC's President Robert Lieber was unable to provide detailed facts and figures including the development project costs, tax subsidies for developers, affordable housing, and living wage jobs for the estimated proposed $3 billion project. Council Members expressed concern that a depressed housing market, a likely recession and rising constructions costs make this project unrealistic.

The city plans to certify the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) in February 2008, which starts an estimated seven month long public approvals process. In this short time frame, details for the proposed project would need to be ironed out before the Council gives their final approval. Councilwoman Helen Sears pointed out that the city's schedule to proceed with the plan was extremely ambitious and wanted answers to the viability of the project before the clock starts ticking on the land use process. Councilwoman Katz, Chair of the Land Use Committee, noted her fear that filing of the ULURP before details of the project are known will usurp the Council's input and jurisdiction in the land use process.

During yesterday's hearing Queens Councilman Eric Gioia stated that he was troubled by the concept of eminent domain and noted it was a slippery slope as to when it necessary and reasonable for the government to use eminent domain. Members appeared unanimous in their opinion that the city's threat to use eminent domain is the wrong way to resolve the issues in Willets Point. "Eminent domain is nothing more than legalized theft," said Dan Feinstein, President of Feinstein Ironworks, a Willets Point business. "As the landowners, we find it unacceptable to start negotiations with a gun to our head."

Queens Councilman John Liu noted eminent domain seems to be used as a first resort when dealing with the little guy in NYC but not with deep-pocket landowners. "Taking private property and giving it to another private entity makes a mockery of our Constitutional rights," said Anthony Fodera, owner of Willets Point business Fodera Foods. "American soldiers are fighting all over the world to preserve and expand the democratic principals that our country was founded upon, and here I am, fighting for my fundamental property rights here in America. It's a hypocrisy and a disgrace."

Queens Councilman Tony Avella predicted that eminent domain abuse will be a big issue in the 2009 election. It was evident after the hearing that the Council will likely oppose the use of eminent domain at Willets Point.

Intentional damage

Builders demolish so they can build bigger houses or two or three houses where one had stood before. This practice can endanger the adjacent homes and is often in violation of the approved plans which may be self-approved.

Precautions lacking in demolition of homes

The innocent adjacent homeowners are sometimes forced out of their home and the builder still doesn't repair the damage. The homeowner has to spend the money to sue. An unscrupulous builder did this to a woman's property in Bayside about three years ago when he built three houses on a lot that originally had one. The DOB had permitted him to put the houses in sideways. As far as I know, the lady's property in Bayside has not been repaired.

Why doesn't New York City help these innocent property owners, since it let unscrupulous builders self-approve or just didn't stop the builders quick enough? Civic leaders complain that the DOB doesn't do enough. The innocent people pay property taxes and pay any fines they receive, unlike the unscrupulous builders who don't care about laws or fines...Some builders feel that a small fine is part of their expenses, if they do pay the fine.

The most shocking news of November

Ladies and gentlemen, this may be hard to believe, but the community board from hell took exception with a developer's plan to build something out-of-character:

By a vote of 28 to 8, with two abstentions, Community Board 1 voted to deny an application for an amendment of the zoning map at its November meeting in Astoria.


Bd 1. Rejects 31st St. Zoning Change

Along 31st Street, between 21st Avenue and 20th Avenue, Santino DiFiore owns a row of residential four-story buildings that date back to 1926 and sit comfortably next to one another. At the end of the block, a vacant lot, presently used for parking, is undeveloped.

DiFiore also owns that property and wants to build on it. While it is his right to develop a sixstory residential building in the existing R5 zoning district, he applied for an amendment of the zoning map to change zoning for the entire block from R5 to R6A.

Building tumor

When I saw a link on Curbed to a post on Brownstoner calling a building in Brooklyn an "atrocity" I thought, well this can't be any worse than what we have here in Queens. But I must say after clicking the link that this is pretty damn bad...

14 Months Later, Still No Buyers for 45 Third Place!