With NYU considering adding a 40-story building or two to its Silver Towers property as part of the school's expansion, Greenwich Village preservationists are campaigning like mad to get I.M. Pei's creations landmarked. Which is funny, because if the Silver Towers were scheduled to be built today, there would probably be hunger strikes and riots against them. [Curbed]
7 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Of course the mainline preservation community will not say what a joke this is.
Another instance of "damned if you do, damned if you don't".
If preservationists didn't want to save these god-awful ugly things, NYU would be proposing to tear them down and once they got the permits, the media would attack the preservationists for not caring about these "works of art" and "important examples of urban planning".
Italicized passages and many of the photos come from other websites. The links to these websites are provided within the posts.
Why your neighborhood is full of Queens Crap
"The difference between dishonest and honest graft: for dishonest graft one worked solely for one's own interests, while for honest graft one pursued the interests of one's party, one's state, and one's personal interests all together." - George Washington Plunkitt
The above organizations are recognized by Queens Crap as being beneficial to the city as a whole, by fighting to preserve the history and character of our neighborhoods. They are not connected to this website and the opinions presented here do not necessarily represent the positions of these organizations.
The comments left by posters to this site do not necessarily represent the views of the blogger or webmaster.
7 comments:
Of course the mainline preservation community will not say what a joke this is.
The law should be overturned.
Sooner or later a developer will do it!
Another instance of "damned if you do, damned if you don't".
If preservationists didn't want to save these god-awful ugly things, NYU would be proposing to tear them down and once they got the permits, the media would attack the preservationists for not caring about these "works of art" and "important examples of urban planning".
the media would attack the preservationists for not caring about these "works of art" and "important examples of urban planning".
-------
Maybe the 'official groups' but not the grassroots, buddy, not the grassroots.
We have had out hearts hardened by the developers, politicians, and our (sadly) 'brother' preservationists.
Maybe the 'official groups' but not the grassroots, buddy, not the grassroots.
We have had out hearts hardened by the developers, politicians, and our (sadly) 'brother' preservationists.
+++++++++++++++++++
what? What is this discussion about?
I guess we can expect Andrew Berman again....distributing leaflets and raising hell!
After all, this is "The Village"
and whatever Berman (and his "swells') want Berman gets!
In Queens, on the other hand, our "preservationists"
are busy tugging at their "Johnsons"!
Damn him for being effective!
Calling QHS .
Oops, I just got a busy signal.
They must be mounting a new exhibit
on the diverse vitality of Flushing's new residents (funded in part by borough hall).!
Post a Comment