Read all about it! Here are the indictment papers, courtesy of AM-NY.You may also weigh in on their online poll: Vote: Do you think Gallagher is guilty?
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The Crap-O-Sphere ("Crappy")
Artwork by Jerry Rotondi
The official mascot of Queens Crap
The Crap-O-Sphere ("Crappy")
"Let us dare to read, think, speak and write." - John Adams, 1765
Spotted a piece of Queens Crap in your community?
Write to us at QueensCrapper@gmail.com
Please note
Italicized passages and many of the photos come from other websites. The links to these websites are provided within the posts.
Why your neighborhood is full of Queens Crap
"The difference between dishonest and honest graft: for dishonest graft one worked solely for one's own interests, while for honest graft one pursued the interests of one's party, one's state, and one's personal interests all together." - George Washington Plunkitt
Willets Point United Against Eminent Domain Abuse
Artwork by Jerry Rotondi
Become a fan of Queens Crap on Facebook.
Sites that kick ass:
The above organizations are recognized by Queens Crap as being beneficial to the city as a whole, by fighting to preserve the history and character of our neighborhoods. They are not connected to this website and the opinions presented here do not necessarily represent the positions of these organizations.
The comments left by posters to this site do not necessarily represent the views of the blogger or webmaster.
Street or satellite shots used here are from Google Maps or Windows Live Local.
The comments left by posters to this site do not necessarily represent the views of the blogger or webmaster.
Street or satellite shots used here are from Google Maps or Windows Live Local.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(2365)
-
▼
August
(203)
- The 'bullseye building' in Dutch Kills
- Development complaints skyrocket
- Riders give 7 a 'C minus'
- AM-NY visits the Rockaways
- FNY in Hunters Point
- Future of the Elmhurst Library?
- Crappy on Racked
- Stories of preservation
- Was Pinky's accuser harassed by the NYPD?
- Unhappy with Crappy
- Location, location
- More arboricide in Maspeth
- Queens sewers not up to speed
- The rich get richer and the poor get poorer
- Crap Columns
- This is not a new house
- "What the...?" in the Meatpacking District
- Bloomie: "What's a little water?"
- Smoking caused Deutsche building fire
- Member of the dirty pol club
- Bait and switch
- NJ Senator in lobbying probe
- Crap village in Rego Park
- The Powerhouse - seeing is disbelieving
- Not getting what they paid for
- Houseboats forced to pick up anchor
- People made to move, lots left to the rats
- A tram for Fort Totten
- Storm causes big fat rat to scurry
- Tin Can Alley
- Call to have FDNY retirees inspect buildings
- It's not the first time Bovis is in trouble
- Avella vs. Crescent crap
- Sunnyside gets a facelift
- Some food-related quickies
- SUV crap
- New York Post pissed at Times Ledger
- Bye-bye Ben's?
- 'Cat & mouse game' at Deutsche building
- A tale of two Jamaicas
- Race matters
- Corporal punishment
- Rally against the Jamaica Plan
- Crappy's arrived!
- More street trees for Queens
- Bronx Hall of Waste
- Ladder 39 - the Pride of Woodlawn
- Stop in the name of the law!
- Soaked by tweeders
- Drinking tap water with Bob
- Creme de la Bronx crap
- More firefighters hurt at Deutsche building
- Council vs. containers
- Jamaica plan enters the home stretch
- Pete vs. pervs
- United against United Homes
- Crappy on the go
- Excavation a problem
- City says 'scram' to scammers
- Big plan for Metro corner
- New portable Queens Crap issue
- Putting up crap on Putnam
- Crappy visits City Hall
- ‘Street God has forgotten’
- Fixing up the Forest Hills Tennis Stadium
- Powerhouse crap
- Padavan against Jamaica plan
- Cromwell Crescent crap
- Crappy underground
- NY1's Queens: Then & Now
- Keep your Queens Crap rat-free
- More skeeter spraying for Queens
- Outta cash & outta luck
- Comm. board votes on Columbia expansion
- The Future Of New York
- State lawn litter bill becomes law
- Cause of fatal blaze under investigation
- A Grand 'Alteration'
- Johnny: Asians don't dump grease in sewers
- Guttman getting away with it
- Overdevelopment causing loads of garbage
- FDNY: Contractor responsible for deaths
- CB6 unanimously passes Forest Hills rezone
- Seeking dead end to development
- Quality-of-Life Inspectors Will Scoot in the City
- Parks flip-flops on U.S. Open parking plan
- Centerville still waiting after all these years
- Another corner of crap in Bayside
- Vickie still lost at sea
- Politicians divide us, politics lead us astray
- Queens Machine blames overdevelopment!
- Queens actress selling her mansion
- Bayside crap corner
- Tearing down the Times
- Sidestepping
- Blasting away at explosives
- Queens Library is best in nation
- The bad old days
- Flushing break up
- Buddhist Temple: Crap or not crap?
-
▼
August
(203)
Send submissions to:
queenscrapper@gmail.com
Include address of property and any other information you have about it.
All contributors will remain anonymous.
Include address of property and any other information you have about it.
All contributors will remain anonymous.
23 comments:
If there is any justice, this will be the first of many indictments against this rapist of the community. The corruption charges will follow once the eyes of investigators are opened.
Based on the indictment, this is going to be a binary "He said...She said".
Don't get your hopes up.
Yummy.....
justice will finally be served.
And Pinky will be served a lovely fare of prison diet,
complete with (pink) plastic tableware !
Based on the indictment, you can't tell anything about the evidence that the DA has with regards to this case, so how can you determine that it will be a "he said, she said?"
Watch Pinky's minions furiously vote "no" in the poll. Before the link was posted here, the vote tally was overwhelmingly "yes."
18 people who never met Gallagher's rape victim "know" she's just an opportunist (I guess that's because he's an "esteemed", "honorable" man).
In other words, they would rape too, as long as they knew they could have stupid supporters like themselves.
I don't believe he's guilty, but he is immoral. That is reason enough to remove him from office.
I too, believe he is innocent of the 10 counts against him. But even as someone who personally lkes him, its painfully obvious there is so much wrong with how he's led his life and administered his office. I'm hoping that true justice prevails, that he is vindicated, but he must step down and he must seek the professional help he so desperately needs.
Hey Christina, Do you think Gallagher is guilty. Oh yes you do, well let me tell you something, The United States constiution states "Innocent Unless proven Guilty" so Christina Please reas that quote and while your at it show it to Adolf Holden.
P.S. I bet you wont post this
I posted the previous comment so you can see how badly Dennis Gallagher supporters read, write and spell. They don't need no ed-u-ca-shun!
The United States constiution states "Innocent Unless proven Guilty"
Please find that for me:
U.S. Constitution
Prove me wrong said...
"Hey Christina, Do you think Gallagher is guilty. Oh yes you do, well let me tell you something, The United States constiution states "Innocent Unless proven Guilty" so Christina Please reas that quote and while your at it show it to Adolf Holden.
P.S. I bet you wont post this"
Here's an idea Ms. Prove me Wrong: Cite the Article, clause or word in ANY part of the US Constitution that states: "innocent unless proven guilty".
The CONCEPT of PRESUMED innocent ... is reserved for the courtroom. The judge and jury must reserve their conclusion until all evidence has been presented.
Certainly the prosecutor believes the defendant is guilty, and makes every effort throughout the trial to persuade the jury to the same belief.
The defense attorney probably KNOWS that the defendant is guilty just as much as the defendant does, but, he's a hired hand and just want to win.
The court officers probably believe the defendant is guilty, so their job is to stand nearby in the event of an outbreak of violence.
So, grow up and knock off the inane and uneducated gibberish about that which you know nothing.
We adults, who can reason these things through, already found the rapist guilty, and are unafraid to announce that conclusion in writing and in public. The bad luck we have is that we are powerless to compel our beliefs upon the judicial system. But, again as adults, we accept that.
You lose your idiotic bet. Now, take time to study to improve your spelling, punctuation and grammar. After that, have your attorney write your comments.
Your gratuitous reference to Mr. Robert Holden as "Adolf" says much more about you than the man whose feet you are not worthy to lick.
Go back to sucking on the rapist - he's guilty!
This is only the beginning for the man they call Pinky.
He has opened so many windows in his glass house that the investigators are lining up to get a crack at him.
After the rape case, corruption charges will follow.
Pinky was advised very early on not to play with fire, he decided he would crush his opponents instead.
He under estimated his opponents in a big way, particulary when you live in a glass house, you shouldn't throw stones.
It was so easy for his opponents to fend this loser off because he has so many, and I mean many, skeltons in the closet of his glass house. Here's the unlucky 13 list for Pinky, some immoral, some criminal:
1. sexual harassment
2. assault
3. rape
4. porn distributor
5. gambler
6. drug addict
7. graff taker
8. adultery
9. mis use of his office for campaigning
10. mis use of his office for sex flings
11. abuse of his staff
12. mis use of his duties and resources as a Council Member
13. a drunken everyday bum, who needs rehab
With this laundry list, it's not hard that his opponents are crushing him....the power of We the People!
We the People will not tolerate this man representing us and nor should anyone else that calls themselves a decent citizen.
"He said, she said" -
It's only the beginning, it's a long road thatI wouldn't want to walk down.
There appears to be a lot of evidence and witnesses from previous flings.
He will get convicted of a least one or two of the counts and that means his career is over.
It may mean jail time as well.
If the bigger counts drop, lookout, we talking 15 years. Ouch!
Gallagher is in deep donkey dog doo doo.
After this case, the DOI will be stepping in, BIG TIME.....it's only the begining!
I wouldn't want to be in his size 6 shoes!
That's not a very friendly list that was posted.
Besides jail, this man's going to hell!
Oh my God!
What a crook!
Pinky the rapist trying to squirm like a worm, but this time, justice has caught up to him.
What exactly is he doing behind those closed curtains where the crime took place representing our public interests the last few days?
Nothing, absolutely nothing.
The big celebration will be when he gets convicted, but I am enjoying ever minute watching the lighter shade of Pink turn beat red every time he hits the TV or newspaper.
There's coverage every single day.
Check out the Sun today.
I heard they abuse midgets even more in prison than regular folk.
14th Ammendmant
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Commentary By US Supreme Court
The principle that there is a presumption of innocence in favor of the accused is the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary, and its enforcement lies at the foundation of the administration of our criminal law.... Concluding, then, that the presumption of innocence is evidence in favor of the accused, introduced by the law in his behalf, let us consider what is 'reasonable doubt.' It is, of necessity, the condition of mind produced by the proof resulting from the evidence in the cause. It is the result of the proof, not the proof itself, whereas the presumption of innocence is one of the instruments of proof, going to bring about the proof from which reasonable doubt arises; thus one is a cause, the other an effect. To say that the one is the equivalent of the other is therefore to say that legal evidence can be excluded from the jury, and that such exclusion may be cured by instructing them correctly in regard to the method by which they are required to reach their conclusion upon the proof actually before them; in other words, that the exclusion of an important element of proof can be justified by correctly instructing as to the proof admitted. The evolution of the principle of the presumption of innocence, and its resultant, the doctrine of reasonable doubt, make more apparent the correctness of these views, and indicate the necessity of enforcing the one in order that the other may continue to exist.
Remember everyone thought OJ was guilty too.
What happend to my post by the supreme court concerning the presumption of innocence? Did you censor out because it didn't help your agenda?
That's nice, but Pinky hasn't been denied equal protection under the law, nor has he been declared guilty by a court without a trial. Personal or journalistic opinion does not constitute violation of Pinky's rights under the Constitution.
Unless you count the court of public opinion on this web site, which has him guilty of a slew of illegal and immoral infractions. While I will agree that he has rendered himself ineffectual and should resign, I will not call him guilty of a crime until a jury does.
Post a Comment