That seems to be a generously sincere move on Mo's part. Too bad he didn't think of using his bat on the Starret City mob. Can Queens borrow use of it againt some of our scurvy political/ real estate guys? I'm only kidding, folks......not inciting any violent behavior here. (But I do like the metaphoric image of using a club on political clubhouse types).
Along with losing Stuyvesant Town, we are losing thousands of units of 'affordable housing.'
We should expose this myth that saying we want to build more 'affordable housing' on the right, as we take away 'affordable housing' on the left, as a cynical ploy to win over the middle class to development.
So why doesn't some planning group like Pratt or Hunter etc take up the problem on how to keep the affordable housing we already have?
Italicized passages and many of the photos come from other websites. The links to these websites are provided within the posts.
Why your neighborhood is full of Queens Crap
"The difference between dishonest and honest graft: for dishonest graft one worked solely for one's own interests, while for honest graft one pursued the interests of one's party, one's state, and one's personal interests all together." - George Washington Plunkitt
The above organizations are recognized by Queens Crap as being beneficial to the city as a whole, by fighting to preserve the history and character of our neighborhoods. They are not connected to this website and the opinions presented here do not necessarily represent the positions of these organizations.
The comments left by posters to this site do not necessarily represent the views of the blogger or webmaster.
3 comments:
That seems to be a generously sincere move on Mo's part. Too bad he didn't think of using his bat on the Starret City mob. Can Queens borrow use of it againt some of our scurvy political/ real estate guys? I'm only kidding, folks......not inciting any violent behavior here. (But I do like the metaphoric image of using a club on political clubhouse types).
Along with losing Stuyvesant Town, we are losing thousands of units of 'affordable housing.'
We should expose this myth that saying we want to build more 'affordable housing' on the right, as we take away 'affordable housing' on the left, as a cynical ploy to win over the middle class to development.
So why doesn't some planning group like Pratt or Hunter etc take up the problem on how to keep the affordable housing we already have?
That is because the only want to do development projects for displacing poorer neighborhoods
(BTW, we don't see Pratt suggesting they level Brooklyn Heights as they did a study for Goodwill that ignores the even older fabric of Old Astoria,
or for Hunter to suggest for their local community in the East Side all those nasties they contemplate for Dutch Kills, Corona, and Sunnyside)
Post a Comment