Word comes from my pals at Willets Point United that last week NY1 called their spokesperson, Richard Lipsky, and asked him to debate Claire Shulman about Willets Point. Lipsky accepted but Claire declined. Damn. Would I have enjoyed that!
9 comments:
Anonymous
said...
RU kidding?
"Old granny panties" would have crapped in her drawers at the sight of Lipsky!
She'll be compost before that WP project has the chance of a snowball in hell of ever being started!
Her legacy to Queens?
CORRUPTION, ABUSE, INDIFFERENCE, ARROGANCE....you can complete the list
She couldn't make the debate because she had a fitting for her orange jumpsuit. Where is the Federal Government and why are they letting her get away with all her criminal activity?
Italicized passages and many of the photos come from other websites. The links to these websites are provided within the posts.
Why your neighborhood is full of Queens Crap
"The difference between dishonest and honest graft: for dishonest graft one worked solely for one's own interests, while for honest graft one pursued the interests of one's party, one's state, and one's personal interests all together." - George Washington Plunkitt
The above organizations are recognized by Queens Crap as being beneficial to the city as a whole, by fighting to preserve the history and character of our neighborhoods. They are not connected to this website and the opinions presented here do not necessarily represent the positions of these organizations.
The comments left by posters to this site do not necessarily represent the views of the blogger or webmaster.
9 comments:
RU kidding?
"Old granny panties" would have crapped in her drawers at the sight of Lipsky!
She'll be compost before that WP project has the chance of a snowball in hell of ever being started!
Her legacy to Queens?
CORRUPTION, ABUSE, INDIFFERENCE, ARROGANCE....you can complete the list
I don't get what a debate would do. When was the last time issues like this came down to reason? Just keep Ratner out.
When is that cunt going to be throw in jail? A benefit to help pay fines for her ILLEGAL activities!!??!?! You do the math.
She couldn't make the debate because she had a fitting for her orange jumpsuit. Where is the Federal Government and why are they letting her get away with all her criminal activity?
The foxes are guarding the hen house.
If it were Ackerman, then the foxes would be guarding the whore house!
How about Lipsky vs. Pinsky instead?
How about Lipsky vs. Pinsky instead?
The "sky"'s the limit.
How about Lipsky vs. Pinsky, moderated by NY1 political producer Mike Nitzky?
How about Lipsky vs. Pinsky, moderated by NY1 political producer Mike Nitzky?
As long as they ignore Evan Stavisky.
Post a Comment