City Council draws up pointless resolution to prevent building more jails on Rikers Island to assure approval for borough tower prisons.

NY Daily News

The city will prohibit construction of new jails on Rikers Island under a proposal approved by the Council’s land use committee on Thursday.

The resolution allows the Council to submit an application to the Department of City Planning to remap the island so that the land can’t house inmates after 2026, when the troubled complex is expected to close.

Mayor de Blasio and Council Speaker Corey Johnson said the map change, which must go through the city’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure, ensures the island will cease as a correctional facility after the new jails are built even after they leave office.

“We’re making our commitment ironclad and ensuring no future administration can reverse all the progress we’ve made,” de Blasio said in a statement. “Mass incarceration did not begin in New York City, but it will end here.”

The 17-member Council land use committee passed the resolution 11 to 2, with two other lawmakers abstaining and two absent from the vote. Councilman Bob Holden, who is not on the land use committee, said the vote “sets an extremely dangerous precedent in New York City, with the Council essentially turning the ULURP process on its head and neglecting the voices of our citizens.”

CB ok's supermarket because it survived storm

From The Brooklyn Paper:

Due to zoning laws, the Cherry Hill Gourmet Market has been running a popular but illegal grocery operation out of the historic Lundy’s building since it started up in 2009. The community initially didn’t appreciate hosting a business that willfully violates city zoning laws, but many neighbors had a change of heart after seeing how the business has persevered throughout the hardships unleashed by Sandy.

“I think there is one word to clarify what happened,” said Community Board 15 chairwoman Theresa Scavo. “It’s ‘Sandy.’ ”

Hoping to rectify the long-standing zoning issue, Cherry Hill Gourmet is working with the Department of City Planning to reach a workable compromise, but the agency wouldn’t even begin talks with the grocers until they received a non-binding letter from board 15 supporting the market.

“City Planning wanted a non-binding letter saying that we will keep an open mind down the road if they come forward with a feasible option to allow them to remain there,” said Scavo. “City Planning does not want to allocate man-time if they don’t stand a chance of getting through the community board.”

Low and behold, at a sparsely attended meeting the board voted 11 to one — with 37 members absent— in favor of sending the letter. The general consensus was that with so many businesses flooded out, what’s the sense of pushing out the popular grocer over what many feel is a technicality?

“The same people who voted for it now were against it for years. They felt that voting in favor of an illegal business would set a bad precedent,” said board member Edmond Dweck. “I don’t condone illegality, but [Cherry Hill] is good for the community. They were up and running after Sandy a lot sooner than a lot of other businesses.”

Some community leaders, however, feel that natural disasters should not trump city ordinances, and whether or not the market is well liked, there’s nothing good about supporting an illegal operation that’s competing with legally operated businesses.