Sunday, April 3, 2022

Endangered Spaces

Snow geese share the landscape with the A train in Broad Channel. The mix of wild natural features and city infrastructure  makes the area distinctive.

New York Times 

Don Riepe pointed to the line on the wall five and a half feet above his kitchen floor. That was where floodwaters reached during Hurricane Sandy in 2012.

His home, a humble two-story wooden structure, is decorated with nautical maps, horseshoe crabs and assorted maritime paraphernalia. It sits right on Jamaica Bay, with a small dock at the water’s edge, where he moors his 22-foot boat. He has a spectacular view of the east end of the bay with the spires of Manhattan in the distance.

Mr. Riepe, a former manager of the Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge, considers himself blessed to be surrounded by nature and still have all the perks of a big city a subway ride away. But he knows his neighbors’ time there may be coming to an end. During his four decades living in the area, Hurricane Sandy was the worst Mr. Riepe has seen; the flooring and all the electrical appliances on the first floor of his house were destroyed. Since then, during lesser storms and even high tides, he moves his computer and furniture upstairs, where he sleeps — and he hopes for the best.

Mr. Riepe is just one of tens of thousands of residents who live on the wild fringes of Queens, in communities like Hamilton Beach, Edgemere and Howard Beach, where the ocean threatens to encroach as sea level rises and coastal storms intensify owing to climate change. It is also the focal point of a major environmental restoration project that aims to protect the area — and in fact the whole city — by returning salt marshes and sand dunes to their natural states. How this will affect the community of Broad Channel (the only inhabited island in Jamaica Bay) remains to be seen.

Already, Mr. Riepe’s neighbors are scrambling to adjust to their new climate-changed reality — moving their cars to higher ground on high-tide days, and in some cases converting their ground floors into garages and shifting their living quarters upstairs and out of harm’s way. One thing that they are not yet prepared to do, however, is move out.

 


Crains New York 

Flushing Meadows–Corona Park, one of the most frequently flooded green spaces in the city, is getting a comprehensive plan on how best to adapt Queens’ largest park to climate change.

This month a congressional spending bill green-lit a $530,322 grant for the Waterfront Alliance to lead a climate resilience plan for the 897-acre park. Those federal dollars, which Queens Rep. Grace Meng requested from Congress last year, will enable the alliance to develop a road map of infrastructure projects and priorities to stymie prolific park flooding, which is only expected to worsen with increasingly heavy rains and sea level rise.

After heavy rainfall, it’s common for huge puddles to transform park basketball courts and fields into ponds for days. Overflow from both Meadow and Willow lakes frequently engulfs trails, making the park a challenge to navigate. Hurricane Ida laid those challenges bare with torrential rains that flooded the park and overflowed onto the Van Wyck Expressway and Grand Central Parkway, which spurred emergency rescues for drivers trapped on the roads.

That’s nothing compared to what’s on the horizon. Without upgrades, much of the green space, which is a former tidal wetland, could be permanently inundated by 2080, the New York Panel on Climate Change said.

Karen Imas, vice president of programs at the Waterfront Alliance, said the city must ensure the park is “prepared for our climate future.” The best way to do that, she said, is by developing a plan with those who know the park best.

“This is really an opportunity to work hand in hand with the community in and around the park and with city agencies to identify what are the greatest hazards and vulnerabilities, and how they can be addressed,” Imas said. That will likely be through a mix of projects, including wetland restoration, bioswales and revamped sewage infrastructure, she added.

 

 

 

10 comments:

NPC_translator said...

"as sea level rises and coastal storms intensify owing to climate change"

Horseshit.

Sea levels have been rising more or less steadily for hundreds of years. There is no acceleration due to "climate change." And in New York, as in many places, the "sea level rise" is partly due to land subsidence: that is, the land is going down. Because the earth's plates are constantly moving. The ground rises in some places and falls in others. None of the alarmist predictions about sea level rise -- which have been going on five decades at least -- have come true.

In 1988, a Washington Post reporter asked Hansen [famous NASA global warming fraud] what a warming Earth would look like in 20 or 40 years in the future. Hansen reportedly looked out a window and said New York City’s “West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water.”

Oops. I guess the con artist was wrong. As he's been about everything.

In any case, people need to stop whining because they built a house where no house should have ever been built.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/03/29/34-years-of-flawed-failed-grossly-misrepresented-global-sea-level-rise-speculation/

Liman said...

$530k not to fix anything in FMP, just to make a list of what to fix. In other breaking news, Broad Channel tends to flood. Returning marshes and sand dunes to their "natural state" will not hold back the tide in Broad Channel.

Anonymous said...

@NPC_doofus,
not only are you a world renowned doctor and virologist, but now you reveal yourself as a leading expert on climate science. I believe you've also demonstrated expertise in teaching, posting links to very dubious websites, and other skills too numerous to list here.
And still we have commentators here who have the audacity to refer to you as a complete and utter doofus, dimwit and all round blowhole.

Sad.

Anonymous said...

The true scientists have known this for decades. This happens when science is ignored and politics rules. But, but, but, 97% of scientist say…..

Anonymous said...

In the effort to save the climate, are we destroying the environment ? This is the question.

Anonymous said...

With today's technology nuclear power is a real solution for America, safe, efficient and clean.

Anonymous said...

Waste of tax payers money !

Anonymous said...

The climate changes daily so let's call this what it really was known as-globull warming.

While it may be nice to live out there in nature is it a smart idea to do so? Sure doesn't seem like it.

Anonymous said...

It's very difficult to rank the importance of the various lies on Climate Change/Global Warming.
Prove Me Wrong...

Anonymous said...

The woke Climate mob is never satisfied !