Sunday, November 3, 2013

Government helps developers make billions

From the Wall Street Journal:

A small boom is under way in the area for housing for New Yorkers who have middle incomes or who are among the working poor—with more than 500 subsidized apartments under construction or on the way.

Developers say that with land costs and construction costs rising, they can't afford to build market-rate rental buildings without deep government subsidies that come with the affordable housing. Those range from tax-exempt bonds to federal tax credits to property tax exemptions and zoning bonuses.

But many housing advocates say some of the subsidies would be better spent backing many more affordable apartments—at a lower cost—in humbler neighborhoods. They want the benefits to luxury developers sharply pared back.

The subsidies come from a state-run program known as 80-20. Developers set aside 20% of the apartments in a building for affordable rentals, with the rest rented at market rates. Tenants are selected through lotteries and are screened to make sure they meet strict income requirements. "Low-income tenants think they've won the lottery when they're selected, but the real lottery winners are the developers," said one builder of low-income housing outside of Manhattan, who didn't want to be identified due to the risk of jeopardizing future projects.

Advocates are critical of the tax-exemption program available in affluent neighborhoods triggered by participation in the affordable housing program. Because of the high tax rates on new market-rate developments, the exemptions translates into large subsidies for developers.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

All of these 80-20, 60-40 and tax abatement deals are just fancy dancing to cover up the fact that since the 1997 Rent Stabilization rape this city has lost over 300,000 TRULY affordable apartments.

500 here. 200 there, don't even begin address what has been done to our city by these bastards.

Anonymous said...

Let's all hope our new Mayor will help the middle class have a affordable option when it comes to housing.

Jon Torodash said...

These talks about the so-called "affordable housing" also usually fail to mention the expiring use clauses, as conveniently fits the bond maturity of the funding source.

The contracts and the can-kicking...

Anonymous said...

Why do they keep sticking a lot of the "affordable housing" in neighborhoods right next to the projects around them? Is the government trying to tell people who have "middle income" now that they belong in the projects? I have seen the subsidized housing list.....one is in Astoria by the projects....the other is in flushing , by the pomonok projects another is in arverne, by the projects....another is in south Jamaica, by the projects.......wtf? All of those have minimum incomes of 45-60000 depending on your family size. The government is trying to tell middle incomers basically that they belong in the projects! The other is in downtown flushing, which is a prostitution ring....and they are only looking for people who only make minimum wage to live there! The good one I seen in lic, you have to be making at least 69000 to live there! So the real "middle incomers" making 45-60000 /year is getting stuck in the projects!

Jerry Rotondi said...

No shit, Sherlock!
One hand washes the other.

Developers buy the friendly pols that they need for ice cream money.
Then these pols (your government) help their developer donors make billions.

$2 street sluts, is what most politicians really are.

Anonymous said...

LOL!
Wait until Paul Vallone takes the 19th district today.
You'll really see how this developers' lobbyist helps his clients make mega bucks.