Showing posts with label Charles Barron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charles Barron. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 23, 2022

Julie Loser

 https://thecity.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/b0325c2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3000x2000+0+0/resize/2048x1365!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.vox-cdn.com%2Fthumbor%2FSdHmdEmFkdiYlERzCLhW6-keCX8%3D%2F0x0%3A3000x2000%2F3000x2000%2Ffilters%3Afocal%281500x1000%3A1501x1001%29%2Fcdn.vox-cdn.com%2Fuploads%2Fchorus_asset%2Ffile%2F23415460%2F042522_council_budget_won_1.jpg

THE CITY 

A rezoning allowing for a massive new real estate development in East New York that would include 11 residential buildings with more than 2,000 apartments passed a key City Council test Thursday, with support from a local representative best known for his oppositional stances.  

Councilmember Charles Barron (D-Brooklyn), an avowed socialist and frequent opponent of rezonings, backed the plan for Innovative Urban Village after years of negotiations with the developers — an unyielding stance that he says resulted in a project with solely affordable units for the overwhelmingly Black and Latino, working-class neighborhood.

The plan, as initially envisioned by Gotham Organization and the Christian Cultural Center, a megachurch in Starrett City that owns the land, originally proposed rentals for residents making between 30% and 120% of the New York City region’s area median income — currently anywhere from $40,000 to $160,000 for a household of four.

But after community feedback and negotiations with Barron’s office, the developer brought the income limits down to between 30% and 80% of the median income, or between $40,000 and $106,000 for a family of four. According to 2019 data compiled by the Furman Center, the local community district’s median household income was $48,000 and more than half of the area’s households earned incomes that would qualify.

Barron, a former Black Panther and a longtime adversary of Brooklyn’s Democratic Party establishment, said the project should set an example for other City Council members with proposals for large developments in their districts, as well as the Adams administration, about how to get to “yes” without rubber-stamping projects with rents beyond what local residents can afford.

The same Council committee also unanimously approved another large rezoning, known as Innovation QNS, following lengthy negotiations with local Astoria Councilmember Julie Won (D-Queens), who had initially raised objections to what she called insufficient affordable housing.

The $2 billion project is slated to bring nearly 3,000 apartments to an area near Northern Boulevard, about one-third of which are categorized as affordable.  

The project is backed by building workers’ union 32BJ SEIU and Queens Borough President Donovan Richards, who ridiculed Won as she held out, citing concerns that the arrival of luxury units will exacerbate gentrification in the area.

In a statement, Won explained her apparent change of heart by pointing to “wins” including an increase in affordable units that her team had secured — though those modifications appeared to fall short of the 55% affordable threshold she had initially demanded.

 We’ve been negotiating daily to secure unprecedented levels of affordability for my immigrant and working-class community,” Won said, adding that she was “finalizing negotiations for commitments from the developer and the Mayoral administration.”

In effect, she let the project proceed through the subcommittee, which is where other lawmakers usually defer to the desires of the local council member, prior to receiving a firm, written commitment.  

“As the council member, I will utilize every accountability measure to ensure that our community wins are actualized,” Won continued.

 

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Here are the winners of yesterday's primary

From NY1:

In Queens, Assemblywoman Grace Meng was declared the winner in the race for the Democratic nomination for the 6th Congressional District seat.

According to AP numbers as of 12:30 a.m., Meng had 51 percent of the vote with 89 percent of precincts reporting. Assemblyman Rory Lancman had 28 percent, Councilwoman Elizabeth Crowley had 16 percent and Dr. Robert Mittman had 5 percent.

"This is an important win for our shared priorities and our shared understanding that what's different about all of us here in Queens is nothing compared to what we all have in common," Meng said.

Queens Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries was declared the winner over City Councilman Charles Barron for the nomination in the 8th Congressional District.

As of 12:30 a.m., with 98 percent of precincts reporting, AP numbers say that Jeffries leads with 72 percent of the vote to Barron's 28 percent.


Looks like the Machine strategy of vote splitting worked!

Saturday, August 6, 2011

The no-show council members

From the Daily News:

City council members are paid more than $100,000 to represent New Yorkers - but some often don't show up.

Councilman Charles Barron missed 28% of Council meeting and hearings he was supposed to attend in the last fiscal year.

Larry Seabrook (D-Bronx) missed 27% while under indictment on fraud charges, and Council Majority Leader Joel Rivera missed 19%, records show.

Barron, who missed 34 of 121 hearings and meetings last fiscal year, defended his record.

"I have perfect attendance in my community," the Brooklyn Democrat said. "You don't get your attendance checked on going to crises in the community when people are shot and killed."

Seabrook - awaiting trial on federal corruption charges - missed 32 of 118 hearings. He could not be reached.

Other Council members had personal reasons including James Gennaro (D-Queens), who had the third worst attendance. He is the primary caregiver for a family member with a chronic medical condition.

Friday, July 8, 2011

Barron under scrutiny for developer deal

From the Daily News:

Brooklyn City Councilman Charles Barron steered $3 million from a big developer to a community group run by a longtime political aide, the Daily News has learned.

Barron threw his support behind the Related Companies' plan for the massive Gateway II shopping complex in East New York after the firm signed a secret benefits agreement pledging the cash to a coalition run by Andre (A.T.) Mitchell, Barron's former aide.

The Daily News reported Wednesday that Barron and his wife, Assemblywoman Inez Barron, also pumped $350,000 in taxpayer money to Mitchell's nonprofit Man Up! Inc., which helps inmates reenter society.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Quinn re-elected speaker

From the Gotham Gazette:

As expected, Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who took the reins of the City Council in 2006, was re-elected to a four-year term as speaker this afternoon by a vote of 48 to 1.

The only dissenter was Councilmember Charles Barron, who was also running for the position.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Where's Charles Barron when you need him?

Since he was very upset when a bunch of fried chicken places exploited the image of our 44th president, maybe he'll be equally as outraged when he sees Obama advertising "short sales," "foreclosures" and "mortgage relief" not just above the awning, but also in the window. This is right next door to Lemon Ice King of Corona on 108th Street.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Maspeth high school site contaminated


I was waiting for when this would be available since for some reason, SCA does not have it on their website.

Oh, so the site's contaminated. Well that's no shock. There was an active factory on the site when I was a kid. But if this info is in the EIS that the elected officials had access to, then I just have to ask...

Why was Eric Gioia (the great public advocate candidate) up in arms that a school was opened at a contaminated site in LIC but not here? (Gioia voted yes)

Why was the great environmentalist and earth scientist Jim Gennaro going apeshit over the same LIC site but not here? (Gennaro voted yes)

Why did comptroller candidates and financial geniuses John Liu, David Weprin and Melinda Katz not question why the City would go through the expense of using eminent domain to acquire contaminated property that will also require an expensive remediation? (Liu, Weprin and Katz voted yes)

Why was Maria del Carmen Arroyo upset about the toxicity found at a proposed school site in her Bronx district but not here? (Arroyo voted yes)

Why was Charles Barron more upset about perceived Archie Bunkerism than about the health of innocent minority children once again being endangered by The Man? (Barron voted yes)

Why didn't grandmother Helen Sears question the SCA's choice of site? (Sears voted yes)

Why does Elizabeth Crowley want a school in her district built on top of a contaminated site? Why was enrollment an issue for her but not this? (Crowley voted no and then whined to the papers last week that it was everyone else's fault the council voted yes but hers. But she also unbelievably said she could have gotten more no votes if she tried.)

Why is Randi Weingarten not holding a protest in front of this site to protect the health of her members and the children they teach?

Why did Community Board 5 attach a bunch of stipulations onto their yes-out-of-guilt vote, but not include anything about remediation or monitoring?

Why is Public Advocate Betsy Gotbaum not concerned about this? Why is she not holding SCA's feet to the fire for failing to submit the required site remediation and post-construction monitoring plan prior to the council vote?

Why did we allow such god damned morons to take charge of our city?

Why are you reading about this for the first time on a blog instead of in the mainstream press?

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Barron calls hearing attendees "segregationists"

A Council Land Use Committee was held yesterday about the proposed Maspeth high school and after SCA reps spun their lies for a 1/2 hour, Councilmember Charles Barron told the members of the public who attended that they were trying to "turn back the clock to the 1950s," called them "segregationists" and said he was looking at a bunch of white faces saying they wanted to have the school priority zoned so only their white children could attend it. Then he got up and left.

If he had stayed and listened to the testimony, he would have found out that no one was there to testify about having the school priority zoned. Approximately 25 people testified against the site location selected due to factors such as traffic, proximity to other schools and lack of public transportation and parking availability at the site. One person testified in favor of the school (without mentioning local zoning). Councilmember Elizabeth Crowley was the only person who pushed for local zoning for the school.

So apparently the white folk of Queens County were racially profiled by an elected official. But by Charles' standards, the only racist in the room was his colleague, Elizabeth Crowley.

Of course, this was said by the same person who at one time uttered, "I want to go up to the closest white person and say, ‘You can’t understand this, it’s a black thing’ and then slap him, just for my mental health."

And the Democratic Machine unsurprisingly has no problem with this.

It's a shame that in the era of "change" someone still has the mentality of a 1970s Black Panther. Who's the one that's really in favor of turning back the clock?

Friday, January 23, 2009

Kiss up to Quinn or kiss your bills goodbye

Those cozy with City Council Speaker Christine Quinn (D-Manhattan) seem to have an easier time getting legislation passed than her foes, documents obtained by the Daily News reveal.

City Councilmen Tony Avella (D-Queens) and Charles Barron (D-Brooklyn), Quinn's most outspoken critics, count a total of four bills since 2002, a review of records show.

Meanwhile, the speaker had 35 bills inked into law during that period, and Councilman David Weprin (D-Queens), her closest ally in the Council, had 78 passed.

"The speaker is very vindictive, and when you oppose the speaker, she doesn't let bills go through," Avella and some other Council members charged.


Schmooze Christine Quinn and get bills passed, cross her and get nowhere, say pols

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Bloomberg pissed at councilmembers

With one eye on the canyon-like budget gaps and the other on reelection, City Council members voted 33 to 18 last week for a 7% property tax rate hike.

As far as Mayor Bloomberg is concerned, the 18 no-sayers took the cowardly route, not taking responsibility for assuring essential services and workers - such as cops, firefighters and sanitation workers - are maintained.

Heroes or not, here's the 18 who voted against the 7% tax hike: Manhattan: none; the Bronx: Democrat James Vacca; Queens: Republican Anthony Como, Democrats Tony Avella, Joseph Addabbo, James Gennaro, Eric Gioia, Peter Vallone Jr. and Hiram Monserrate; Brooklyn: Democrats Charles Barron, Erik Martin Dilan, Simcha Felder, Lewis Fidler, Vincent Gentile, Diana Reyna and Michael Nelson; Staten Island: Republicans Ignizio and James Oddo and Democrat Michael McMahon.


Mike Bloomberg slams council foes of 7% property tax hike

How many of them asked Quinn for permission to vote no this time?

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

It's deja vu all over again

Resolution 6 - 2002

Resolution condemning former Mayor Giuliani for his surreptitious negotiation with the City’s baseball teams, granting them huge financial concessions and the promise of 1.6 billion dollars in new ball parks, and, in so doing, leaving our City’s taxpayers with crushing obligations to wealthy enterprises at a time when the City is in fiscal crisis.

By Council Members Jennings, Foster, Monserrate, Barron, DeBlasio and Sanders Jr.; also Council Member Boyland

An excerpt:

Whereas, The City, already taken aback by this news, endured yet another surprise upon discovering that the former Mayor also provided the Yankees and the Mets with 60-day escape clauses from their lease if the teams believe that the City is not intending to build the new stadiums as “tentatively” promised by the former Mayor; and

Whereas, The City also discovered at this time that the Mayor had released the Mets from a $83,000 debt to the City, leaving it with all that much less revenue; and

Whereas, The former Mayor provided these fiscally burdensome deals to these very wealthy and profitable teams at a time when the City is in recovery from a massive and heartbreaking disaster that has placed its budget in a 4 billion dollar deficit; and

Whereas, These deals were negotiated while the City’s 4 billion dollar deficit has threatened the scope of vital services, such as the Head-Start programs, fire and police protection, health care to the poor, and library service; and

Whereas, By attempting to saddle the City with this hastily crafted sweetheart deal for building new stadiums, the former Mayor has engaged in a reverse Robin Hood syndrome by robbing from the poor and giving to the rich; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of New York condemns former Mayor Giuliani for his surreptitious negotiation with the City’s baseball teams, granting them huge financial concessions and the promise of 1.6 billion dollars in new ball parks, and, in so doing, leaving our City’s taxpayers with crushing obligations to wealthy enterprises at a time when the City is in fiscal crisis.

City Council Stated Meeting - April 5, 2006: The New York City Council approved a plan to build a new Yankee Stadium in the Bronx by a vote of 45 to 2. Barron and Foster were the only two members who voted no. The Mets proposal passed 48-1 with only Barron opposing.

"Little kids will no longer have to play in parks that are dilapidated," said Councilmember Joel Rivera. That's right, now they'll have to play in the street...

They can swap the name Giuliani for Bloomberg and reintroduce the same resolution today (which didn't pass the first time around). But no one will have the balls to do it (except maybe Barron).

Photo from Daily News

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Land Use results are in

(The vote was 19-2 so I am going to have to adjust this later for the 4 apparent absentees. Only info I have now is that Avella and Barron voted no and everyone else voted yes.)

Voting YES on WP:

Melinda R. Katz
Maria del Carmen Arroyo*
Maria Baez
Leroy G. Comrie, Jr.
Inez E. Dickens*
Simcha Felder
Daniel R. Garodnick
Eric N. Gioia*
Sara M. Gonzalez*
Vincent Ignizio
Robert Jackson*
Jessica S. Lappin
John C. Liu*
Miguel Martinez*
Michael E. McMahon
Rosie Mendez
James S. Oddo
Annabel Palma*
Joel Rivera
Larry B. Seabrook*
Helen Sears*
Kendall Stewart*
Albert Vann*

* signed August letter denouncing eminent domain

This should be a good issue for anyone planning to challenge these pigs next November. (I'll personally help whoever runs against Gioia.)

Voting NO:

Tony Avella
Charles Barron

Which tweeders will flip?

It was only three short months ago that these words appeared in a letter sent to Amanda Burden:

"We write to share with you our absolute opposition to the current Willets Point Plan...this is a product of a flawed process that has continously ignored the requests of the community in pursuit of a top-down planning process that sets a dangerous precedent for large-scale development projects citywide...the community has unified around an agenda calling for a plan that takes eminent domain off the table in all acquisition negotiations...Before this project proceeds to a doomed fate in the council, we strongly urge the administration to come to the table and work with us to address and resolve the issues of the Willets Point Community."

Sincerely,
Hiram Monserrate, Tony Avella, Thomas White, James Sanders, Jr., Maria del Carmen Arroyo, Annabel Palma, Letitia James, Sara Gonzalez, Darlene Mealy, Mathieu Eugene, Vincent Gentile, Diana Reyna, Albert Vann, Charles Barron, James Gennaro, David Weprin, Rosie Mendez, Miguel Martinez, Gale Brewer, Eric Gioia, Robert Jackson, Melissa Mark-Viverito, Joe Addabbo, Bill deBlasio, Larry Seabrook, Eric Martin Dilan, Kendall Stewart, Helen Foster, Inez Dickens, David Yassky

I'll be doing a "profile in tweeding" in the near future for each council member who flips today.

Photo of Doorman from NY Post

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Council members' positions on term limits

Okay, so the Queens Chronicle has this breakdown of who is in favor, against and undecided about term limits. But NY1's list tells a different story.

Summary
• There are 51 members, including the Speaker.
• 14 say they support the mayor's bill.
• 17 said they oppose it.
• 20 are undecided.

Breakdown
RESPONDED "YES"
Maria del Carmen Arroyo, (D) Bronx
*Maria Baez, (D) Bronx
*Leroy Comrie, (D) Queens
*Erik Martin Dilan, (D) Brooklyn
*Lewis Fidler, (D) Brooklyn
*Robert Jackson, (D) Manhattan
*G. Oliver Koppell, (D) Bronx
*Miguel Martinez, (D) Manhattan
*Michael Nelson, (D) Brooklyn
*Domenic Recchia, (D) Brooklyn
*Diana Reyna, (D) Brooklyn
*Joel Rivera, (D) Bronx
*Larry Seabrook, (D) Bronx
*Al Vann, (D) Brooklyn

RESPONDED "NO"
*Joseph Addabbo, (D) Queens
*Tony Avella, (D) Queens
*Charles Barron, (D) Brooklyn
*Bill de Blasio, (D) Brooklyn
Daniel Garodnick, (D) Manhattan
*James Gennaro, (D) Queens
Vincent Gentile, (D) Brooklyn
*Eric Gioia, (D) Queens
Vincent Ignizio, (R) Staten Island
Letitia James, (D) Brooklyn
*John Liu, (D) Queens
Melissa Mark-Viverito, (D) Manhattan
Darlene Mealy, (D) Brooklyn
Rosie Mendez, (D) Manhattan
Annabel Palma, (D) Bronx
James Vacca, (D) Bronx
*David Weprin, (D) Queens

RESPONDED "UNDECIDED"
*Gale Brewer, (D) Manhattan
Anthony Como, (R) Queens
Inez Dickens, (D) Manhattan
Mathieu Eugene, (D) Brooklyn
*Simcha Felder, (D) Brooklyn
*Helen Foster, (D) Bronx
*Alan Gerson, (D) Manhattan
Sara Gonzalez, (D) Brooklyn
*Melinda Katz, (D) Queens
Jessica Lappin, (D) Manhattan
*Michael McMahon, (D) Staten Island
*Hiram Monserrate, (D) Queens
*James Oddo, (R) Staten Island
*Christine Quinn, (D) Manhattan
*James Sanders, (D) Queens
*Helen Sears, (D) Queens
*Kendall Stewart, (D) Brooklyn
*Peter Vallone, (D) Queens
Tom White, (D) Queens
*David Yassky, (D) Brooklyn

* term limited out in 2010

Friday, August 10, 2007

Avella in the Brooklyn Rail

In recent years, Avella, along with Tish James and Charles Barron, has been one of the few City Council members to speak out against over-development. Among other issues, Avella has challenged the Bloomberg administration on the closing of firehouses, the developer-friendly rezoning of areas including Williamsburg-Greenpoint, and the proposed use of eminent domain to benefit private development in many areas of the city. In mid-June, Rail editor Theodore Hamm sat down with Avella at City Hall Park.

A Ground-Level View of the City

"I don’t understand why we can’t be a city that takes care of its own citizens and listens. I think that’s one of the faults that government has. We don’t listen. We tell people what we think is in their best interest. That’s the reverse of what it should be. We should be listening to city residents and doing what they want."

Photo from The Brooklyn Rail

Friday, June 22, 2007

Help save a landmark in Douglaston

Preservation Alert!
Contact City Council and Ask Them to Uphold Our Landmarks!


On Monday June 25, the City Council Sub committee on Landmarks, Public Siting and Maritime Uses will be voting on the landmark designation of three important structures, 23 and 25 Park Place in Manhattan and 41-45 240th Street in Queens.

The Landmarks Preservation Commission designated 23 & 25 Park Place as individual landmarks in March 2007. Both of these buildings were the former home of the Daily News and two of the "Tribeca 22" - individual buildings which the Landmarks Commission held public hearings for but did not designate at the time of the Tribeca historic district designations. These particular buildings were heard three times in 1989 and 1990 and are considered worthy of being individual landmarks. 41-45 240th Street is an important building in the Douglaston Hill Historic District. Although there has been some confusion about the construction date of the property, the building definitely contributes to the district’s sense of place.

Council members Alan Gerson and Tony Avella (who represent these properties), the local community boards, preservation groups, architects and many members of both communities support the landmarking of these important buildings. However, HDC has recently learned that several members of the Landmarks Subcommittee are leaning against designation - based on owner opposition. In the past, the City Council has deferred to the opinion of the Council Member in whose district the landmarked building is located.

HDC is therefore asking all advocates to reach out to Landmarks Subcommittee Chair Jessica Lappin and state your strong support for these buildings. Ask her not to allow the Subcommittee to vote against the community and their colleagues on these worthy landmarks. A sample letter is below. This is an urgent matter. Please take the time to send your email now. If you send this letter please copy the letter to hdc@hdc.org.

Thank you for your support of New York’s historic neighborhoods.

Simeon Bankoff
Executive Director, Historic Districts Council

Sample letter:

Hon. Jessica Lappin, Chair

Subcommittee on Landmarks, Public Siting and Maritime Use
Email: lappin@council.nyc.ny.us

Cc: arroyo@council.nyc.ny.us, barron@council.nyc.ny.us, comrie@council.nyc.ny.us, liu@council.nyc.ny.us, martinez@council.nyc.ny.us, mendez@council.nyc.ny.us, oddo@council.nyc.ny.us, palma@council.nyc.ny.us, gerson@council.nyc.ny.us, avella@council.nyc.ny.us


Dear Chair Lappin:

I am writing in strong support of the landmark designation of 23 and 25 Park Place in Manhattan and the inclusion of 41-45 240th Street in the Douglaston Hill Historic District in Queens. All of these properties are representative of the irreplaceable historic character that adds to the neighborhoods that define our city. 23 and 25 Park Place are noteworthy examples of 19th-century commercial architecture and served as an early home of the Daily News. 41-45 240th Street is an integral part of the Douglaston Hill Historic District and fits perfectly into the period of significance, 1890-1930, of this suburban style neighborhood.

The most important issue here is owner consent. The Landmarks Preservation Commission is empowered to safeguard the city’s historical, aesthetic and cultural heritage. Owner consent is not required for landmark designation and this is one of the reasons that each proposed landmark designation goes through a public process where the LPC receives public testimony on each designation. Overturning these three designations based on the opposition of the respective owners will create a terrible precedent and greatly impede future designations.

As you are aware, landmark designation has been proven to be a great benefit to the quality of life in communities around the city. We ask that you and the members of this subcommittee uphold these three designations.

Thank you for your attention to this matter and for all your support of landmark preservation in New York City.

Sincerely,

[Name]
[Address]

Friday, June 1, 2007

Racist nut threatens Comrie

After Councilman Leroy Comrie abstained from voting in the Sonny Carson street naming controversy, Councilman Charles Barron's chief-of-staff threatened to murder him should he run for Queens Borough President:
"If it takes an assassination of his ass, he will not be borough president of the borough in which I live," [Viola Plummer] is reported to have said.

COUNCIL 'ASSASSIN'

Asked if Plummer's comment was appropriate, [Barron] said, "Absolutely."

More from the NY Observer.

June 2 opinions from NY Post:

POLITICAL 'ASSASSIN' FEUD BOILS

'ASSASSINATION': NO JOKE

Photo from NY Post