Why is Dutch Kills Civic Association publicly opposing the Queensboro Bridge renaming while the Queens Civic Congress sits silent? This one is a no-brainer!
9 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Because they support buddy boy Vallone and QCC for all intents and purposes conceeds this area to UCCA.
Ed Koch bought his burial plot in Trinity Cemetery in upper MANHATTAN in April 2008. From The "Ed Koch" entry on Wikipedia he stated: "The idea of leaving Manhattan permanently irritates me."
See? Utter contempt for the other boroughs.
Help in this continuing effort to keep this VILE Manhattanite's name OFF OF OUR BRIDGE. Find your NYC Councilmember here and let him/her know your opposition to this unmitigated nerve.
9 comments:
Because they support buddy boy Vallone and QCC for all intents and purposes conceeds this area to UCCA.
Forget about DKCA. The group fighting for the community is DKAL
http://www.nydailynews.com/real_estate/2010/12/03/2010-12-03_dutch_kills_new_yorks_bestkept_real_estate_secret.html
http://www.nydailynews.com
/real_estate/2010/12/03
/2010-12-03_dutch_kills_
new_yorks_
bestkept_real_
estate_secret.html
Save the name "Queensboro Bridge"!
Ed Koch bought his burial plot in Trinity Cemetery in upper MANHATTAN in April 2008. From The "Ed Koch" entry on Wikipedia he stated: "The idea of leaving Manhattan permanently irritates me."
See? Utter contempt for the other boroughs.
Help in this continuing effort to keep this VILE Manhattanite's name OFF OF OUR BRIDGE. Find your NYC Councilmember here and let him/her know your opposition to this unmitigated nerve.
Do it now or forever hold your tongue.
Vallone is against it, he is waiting to get it named Peter Vallone Sr. crossing.
Vallone is against it, he is waiting to get it named Peter Vallone Sr. crossing.
---------------------------------------------
Or double crossing?
QCC did mention it in an email blast and, in polite Queens fashion, ASKED the public not to support having its name changed.
Thats the fighting spirit!
Maybe the Queens Civic Congress has to have a discussion about it first before they make a public statement?
That's the way a lot of civic associations are supposed to make decisions, although many don't.
So when the hell will they have the discussion? After the renaming is pushed through?
The idea was first brought up 2 months ago.
Post a Comment