Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Another four years of Queens Crap and beyond

Image

PIX News 

 New York City voters approved ballot proposals 2, 3, and 4, which are aimed at fast-tracking affordable housing developments, according to the Associated Press.

Over 50% of New York City renters and around 45% of homeowners pay more than 30% of their yearly salary toward housing, according to the Yes on Affordable Housing Coalition.

Proposition 2 creates two alternatives to the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP), the seven-month process for determining how land is used. Not all land in the city goes through ULURP, but zoning changes like affordable housing “must go through public review and approval,” according to the Department of City Planning.

The proposition, which would fast-track affordable housing applications at the City Planning Commission (CPC) or Board of Standards and Appeals (BSA), effectively removes the City Council from the review process.

 Publicly financed affordable housing projects will now be subject to a 90-day review by the BSA, rather than the seven-month process. The CPC will review applications from the 12 communities with the lowest affordable housing rates in New York City within 30 to 45 days.

 Proposition 3 is meant to simplify the approval for smaller infrastructure projects by also keeping the City Council out of the review process. It would create an Expedited Land Use Review Procedure (ELURP), which would involve a 90-day review from the local community board, borough president, and CPC.

 

Proposition 4 establishes the Affordable Housing Appeals Board. Currently, the City Council has the final say in affordable housing projects, with only the mayor able to veto. The new board will have the power to veto the City Council. The borough presidents, City Council speaker, and mayor will all be on the board.

Advocates argue that removing the City Council from the process will help create more affordable, smaller housing quickly, especially in neighborhoods that lack it. Councilmembers, however, say that removing them from the process will give developers too much power and take away theirs.

 

1 comment:

JQ LLC said...

Hi everyone.

My day job for a food app company and trying to keep up with rent and bills are really hindering me from operating this blog and even my own blog Impunity City on a daily basis. Also, I'm really getting up there in years now and it's going to be difficult to keep this up, especially with props 2,3,4,5 that's going to lead to more overdeveloped building and upzoned crap like the recent photo in South Richmond Hill above.

Just wanted to let you know why this blog has been in a coma. Hopefully I'll have more time to post again soon but check out my X/twitter for what's going in South Queens and see how the progressives are progressively making the city worse and will more with this nepobaby dilletante politician in city hall

Post a Comment