Friday, December 6, 2024

The City of Yes, Mess and Less Affordable Housing is complete

 https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GeGys99W8AAi4Ox?format=jpg&name=small

AMNY 

A compromise version of Mayor Eric Adams’ zoning overhaul aimed at easing the city’s dire housing crisis squeaked through the City Council on Thursday, clearing its final hurdle to become law.

The mayor’s “City of Yes for Housing Opportunity” plan, a suite of proposals that promises to allow for “a little more housing in every neighborhood,” passed the 51-member chamber by a slim 31-20 votes on Dec. 5. The city estimates the plan will spur the construction of 82,000 new housing units over the next 15 years, down from the 109,000 homes it was projected to produce before the council’s modifications were made.

All that remains is for Adams to sign what will likely be his greatest signature accomplishment as mayor thus far into law.

Adams, during a City Hall rally on the heels of the vote, compared his administration to the 1986 Mets team that won the World Series.

“We’re gonna argue in the locker room, we’re gonna get in debates, we’re going to do all sorts of things, but you know what? We’re gonna bring home the championship ring,” Adams said. “That’s what we did…You’re seeing the most comprehensive housing reform in the history of the city.”

 

City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, following several council members’ impassioned speeches for and against the plan, said the body “cannot do nothing” about the city’s dire housing crisis. She also emphasized that the modified version of the zoning text amendment hashed out by the council is far better than what the mayor initially proposed.

“This council cannot be the body that says ‘no’ to people that need a place to live,” Speaker Adams said in an emotional speech. “This cannot be the council that turns their back on homeless; this cannot be the council that continues to say ‘scrap it, let’s move ahead and do something else,’ because I tell you that will never happen.”

 

The plan consists of a series of updates to city zoning rules that have not been changed in over half a century. It’s designed to expand the amount of housing that can be built in parts of the Big Apple that typically do not see much development.

The zoning changes only narrowly passed the city legislature even after they were altered last month to assuage many council members’ concerns about them potentially altering the character of the neighborhoods they represent. The final deal between City Hall and the council also includes a $5 billion commitment from Adams’ office and Gov. Kathy Hochul to fund affordable housing construction, housing affordability programs, infrastructure improvements, and more staff for city housing agencies.

Several council members acknowledged that the modifications addressed their concerns and got them to a “yes.” 

 

The lawmakers who voted against the City of Yes included every member of the chamber’s conservative Common Sense Caucus, some Democratic members representing low-rise outer-borough neighborhoods, and one progressive who saw the plan as a giveaway to developers.

City Council Member Joann Ariola (R-Queens) said her “no” vote was driven by her constituents’ concerns that City of Yes would change the character of their neighborhoods. She also expressed concerns that the infrastructure in her district, which covers coastal areas in the Rockaways, will not be able to support the added housing that would come with the plan.

“The city of yes will only add to the heavy burden that residents face every day,” Ariola said. “We don’t have the infrastructure and I know the mayor has promised money for infrastructure. But why are we putting the cart before the horse? Why are we putting the housing up and then worrying about the infrastructure?”

David Carr, a Republican council member representing Staten Island, who also voted “no,” said he believes the plan is “incredibly vulnerable to legal action” and “will not survive” such action, which could be forthcoming.

Progressive Council Member Christopher Marte (D-Manhattan) said he voted against the plan because it is a “yes to only the real estate developers.”

Update:

The lawsuit against the City Of Yes is about to begin. Donate to their gofundme to put a stop to this real estate land and air grab.

  https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/84587211_1733340869119268_r.


We need your support to cover legal fees, compliance costs, and expert consultations as we oppose the City of Yes rezoning plan. This sweeping proposal threatens to undermine our neighborhoods, eliminate public input on critical land use decisions, and promote unchecked overdevelopment and excessive density.

The City of Yes is a giveaway to developers at the expense of our communities’ character, livability, and long-term sustainability. With your help, we can push back and ensure responsible urban planning that prioritizes people, not profits.

Your donation will empower us to make our voices heard and protect the future of our neighborhoods. Join us in this fight—every contribution counts!

 ImageImage

 

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please give the names of Queens Councilmembers who voted "yes"

Anonymous said...

The Ephebic Oath states: "We will transmit this city not only not less, but greater, better and more beautiful than it was transmitted to us."

We will never bring disgrace to our city by any act of dishonesty or cowardice, nor ever desert our suffering comrades in the ranks; we will fight for the ideals and sacred things of the city, both alone and with many; we will revere and obey the city’s laws and do our best to incite a like respect and reverence in those about us who are prone to annul them and set them at naught; we will strive unceasingly to quicken the public’s sense of civic duty; and thus, in all these ways, we will strive to transmit this city not only not less, but greater, better, and more beautiful than it was transmitted to us.

This is a disaster. The most livable areas of the city will be destroyed! Communism/Socialism = spread misery equally. Everyone will live in crap block housing densely packed as they do in third world nations. None will be affordable. Only the developers profit.

Anonymous said...

I don't believe NYC has ever had a bigger fool for a mayor?

Anonymous said...

This is great news for the Corporate Robber Barons and building developers. More houses for private equity to snap up. More cash in the pockets of corrupt politicians.

Anonymous said...

Adrienne 'Payola' Adams was a three-term Chair of Queens Community Board 12. I wonder how much $he's pocketed from REBNY since being Speaker??? 💰 😈

Anonymous said...

Time to create a scaffolding company! $$$$$
All the slumlords and greedy will be slapping up accessory dwellings with hot tubes & party space on the roofs to get premium income.
Nearly every home in Ridgewood & Maspeth has a view of Manhattan, those people will be hit the hardest.
Correct as said, NONE of it will be affordable, the good view added space will go to rich with highest credit scores and garages and basements will go to desperados, homeless and section 8s.

Anonymous said...

Queens CMs who voted YES:

Adrienne Adams, Nantasha Williams, Sevena Brooks-Powers, Tiffany Caban, Julie Won, Shekar Krishnan and Francisco Moya.

Queens CMs who voted NO:

Robert Holden, Joanne Ariola, Vickie Paladino, Linda Lee, Sandra Ung, Lynn Schulman and James Gennaro

Anonymous said...

I see we have one less Robber Baron after last Wednesday's shooting.

Anonymous said...

Are you a communist?

Anonymous said...

"Queens CMs who voted YES:

Adrienne Adams, Nantasha Williams, Sevena Brooks-Powers, Tiffany Caban, Julie Won, Shekar Krishnan and Francisco Moya."

Anyone see a pattern here?

Anonymous said...

Look at those fuckers smiling like they just won the fucking lottery.

Anonymous said...

I can see why the Orange God loves this crook so much.

Anonymous said...

Free Luigi!

Anonymous said...

Is this a new lottery? Does the "fucking lottery" have better odds than the regular lottery?

Post a Comment