 |
| Diversity in action |
More than 24,000 city workers will be forced to stay home Monday when Mayor de Blasio’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate goes into effect, raising concerns about the impact on emergency response times in the five boroughs.
“That’s the question everyone’s asking: How many more minutes will it take to respond, how many more lives will be lost as a result?” one Manhattan patrol cop told The Post on Sunday.
“There’s a correlation between time and mortality that a lot of people in City Hall don’t understand. Unfortunately, the only way they’re going to get the message is by seeing the numbers rise and rise. And seeing how crime is already on the rise, they really need to look at their priorities and decide if this is a good idea, and they need to do it soon.”
Despite a 14 percent bump in the number of city government workers who have gotten at least one shot since de Blasio announced the mandate on Oct. 20, thousands of others would still rather be placed on unpaid leave than get jabbed.
22 comments:
If you think the chaos they are creating is going to disturb them, think again. It is what they want.
"Never let a good crisis go to waste".
It is how communists work.
@@f you think the chaos they are creating is going to disturb them, think again. It is what they want.@@
True. 15K seniors knocked out in the nursing homes, 24K public workers will have to resign, think of the savings in pension, benefits, etc.
Follow the money people.
NYC/NYS leadership has been crying for years that the public pension, retirement liabilities cannot be met. Why?
Vaccines are a grrrrreeeeaaattttt idea!!
We’ve already touched on one: The vaccines appear to induce negative efficacy against infection. This probably arises from a combination of minimally symptomatic super-spreading among the vaccinated, the selective pressure that vaccine-elicited antibodies place upon the virus, and the narrow immunity against an obsolete arrangement of the spike protein that the vaccines confer. For a period of several weeks after dose 1 (and likely dose 3), they also make the vaccinated more susceptible to infection, and mass vaccination campaigns have induced case spikes across many countries.
By now it is also clear that the vaccines cause a range of adverse reactions. The best documented is myocarditis in young men, a side effect observed most frequently after dose 2 of the mRNA vaccines. We probably won’t know the true rate of vaccine-induced myocarditis for many years. From excess mortality in younger cohorts and many anecdotal media reports, we can surmise that it is much more common than anybody will admit.
More jabs because SCIENCE!!!! and I LURV SCIENCESS!!!
It does not take a Ph.D. in public health to extract a sensible vaccination policy from all this:
1. There is just no question that vaccinating low-risk cohorts (including the recovered) is not only pointless, but also dangerous. These aren’t the people who end up in the hospital dying of Corona anyway. And because the vaccinated sooner or later end up driving transmission, there is only downside and no upside here.
2. All the vaccines are good for, is reducing the likelihood of severe disease among the old and the vulnerable. It follows that only the old and the vulnerable should be vaccinated.
3. In these groups, carefully timed annual vaccinations, like flu shots, might well provide good protection at the height of the winter coronavirus season and limit mortality. Even here, though, you’d have to proceed carefully, to avoid causing case spikes in the newly vaccinated during that brief period where their vulnerability to infection is heightened.
Of course, this is the opposite of what our pandemic ideology permits. Instead, almost all of our governments deploy the vaccines in the most reckless and counterproductive ways possible.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
@First Anon.
Those 24,000 city workers are socialists, not communists. There is a difference.
Who is in charge and what is going on?
https://youtu.be/V9uApQ45mWk
Anyway, whatever about anything else. It's good to see the NY Post siding with socialism for a change. I wonder how long that will last for ?
@Those 24,000 city workers are socialists, not communists. There is a difference.
Nobody said that. You are saying it, because you know the difference.
@2. All the vaccines are good for, is reducing the likelihood of severe disease among the old and the vulnerable. It follows that only the old and the vulnerable should be vaccinated.
Wrong. They are called "vaccine", but they are gene therapy shots.
Calling AZT an AIDS medication when it really was a chemo therapy drug is the prime example of these type of lies.
Members of the political elite have no issues with Ivermectin when it comes to their own health.
Whatever bio weapon Fauci and his crew released affects the endothelial cells especially in the lungs. Hence the pneumonia like disease and the ventilators.
Total BS. For the record Cuomo was right when he said is not the flu.
It isn't.
Love is in the air.
Gotta love these people.
https://twitter.com/elaadeliahu/status/1455316333932027905?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
!It's good to see the NY Post siding with socialism for a change!
You see, you read the post and watch Fox. Step in the right direction, just be careful your bosses don't send you to re-education camp.
Gravitas: Revealed: How Pfizer blackmails countries for shots.
https://www.wionews.com/videos/gravitas-revealed-how-pfizer-blackmails-countries-for-shots-422476
Wish we had reporting like this in the good old US of A.
This lady has more backbone than the entire US so called MSM.
Factual, to the point.
For facts, see the contracts.
https://www.citizen.org/article/pfizers-power/#_ftn5
The good people of the world are subjected to NY laws.
Pandemic? Hell no, is vaccine terrorism.
@“ Liberalism is a mental disorder”
SEERofZOG is a mental disorder
Liberalism is a mental disorder ! Let's Go Brandon !
Talk to your Dr. not a troll for Medical Advice !
"SEERofZOG is a mental disorder"
Nerp nerp. C'mon Sol, live and let live, eh?
More vax news from the Mayo Clinic.
On Monday, the bad news focused on the adenovirus jabs, particularly the J&J jab, as researchers from the Mayo Clinic in Rochester Minnesota, who published their findings in JAMA Internal Medicine, compared data from the general population before the pandemic to data gathered from reported vaccine side effects suffered by Americans.
What they found was disturbing: a person who received the vaccine was 3.5x as likely to develop brain blood clots as an average person before the pandemic.
Told ya. And that's just what we know so far. But sure, sure, go get your kids vaccinated, you dolts.
Hey, who's running most of those Big Pharma companies anyway?
@Hey, who's running most of those Big Pharma companies anyway?
Ex FDA officials. FDA is with ex Pfizer officials. On top are the globalist cult leaders.
Good gig if you can get in.
For a period of several weeks after dose 1 (and likely dose 3), they also make the vaccinated more susceptible to infection
Cite your source.
The CDC caused an uproar in early September 2021, after it changed its definitions of “vaccination” and “vaccine.” For years, the CDC had set definitions for vaccination/vaccine that discussed immunity. This all changed on September 1, 2021.
The prior CDC Definitions of Vaccine and Vaccination (August 26, 2021):
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
The Brandon Regime and their definitions:
The CDC Definitions of Vaccine and Vaccination since September 1, 2021:
Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
People noticed. Representative Thomas Massie was among the first to discuss the change, noting the definition went from “immunity” to “protection”.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/cdc-emails-our-definition-of-vaccine
Affirmative action for multinational big Pharma. Absolutely.
@Cite your source.
The UK government data was posted here many times stating the same.
Do your research, save the bookmark, is your problem.
Post a Comment