NY Daily News
Mayor de Blasio’s presidential campaign is powered by donations rife with possible conflicts.
At least $370,000 in contributions to de Blasio 2020 are tied to people and entities with business or interests before the city, an analysis by the Daily News found.
The donations represent 34% of nearly $1.1 million that de Blasio’s campaign collected between May 16 and the end of June, according to filings with Federal Election Commission.
They came from individuals, corporations, limited liability companies and firms with vested interests in municipal operations and regulations, as well as donors who work for entities lobbying the de Blasio administration and relatives of those with business before the city.
Many are hotel workers and owners, attorneys, local real estate developers and others who stand to benefit from their generosity to de Blasio — or have already seen the fruits of their chummy relationship with Hizzoner.
The
mayor has already faced multiple investigations into his fundraising
practices, including whether his administration was favorable to donors
and others with business before the city. Federal and state prosecutors
eventually decided they wouldn’t charge de Blasio or his aides — but
they still said he intervened on behalf of donors seeking favors from
City Hall.
"The fact that Mayor de Blasio’s long shot presidential campaign is so heavily funded by individuals who have interests before the city is troubling, particularly because the mayor has a track record of favoring campaign donors,” said Betsy Gotbaum, executive director of good-government group Citizens Union. “New Yorkers should feel confident that policy decisions are made, and contracts are awarded, based on merit and not because and individual or entity has supported a politician’s campaign.”
Update from THE CITY:
Mayor
Bill de Blasio spent more on his presidential run than he reported in
federal campaign filings this week, an analysis by THE CITY found.
The
extra support came out of a state political action committee de Blasio
launched in 2018 to help New York Democrats — but which recently doubled
as an exploratory committee for his presidential run.
The
mayor’s NY Fairness PAC spent $68,000 on pre-campaign polling that
wasn’t reported to the Federal Election Commission. The de Blasio
campaign promised Thursday to amend its federal disclosures after THE
CITY raised questions.
THE
CITY identified another $55,000 that de Blasio’s state PAC paid to a
firm that does digital fundraising and marketing. The campaign said that
a portion of that expense will appear in a future federal filing.
The
spending underscored what some experts called an unusual approach that
taps a state PAC for presidential expenses amid strictly regulated
federal spending and reporting rules for exploratory committees.
De
Blasio’s set-up also allows his state PAC to collect donations that
don’t get reported in his federal campaign filings — and don’t count
toward the $2,800 contribution limit in the presidential primary.
That’s
because de Blasio campaign officials categorized all the contributions
to the state PAC as donations meant to help elect Democrats in New York
State — not as support for his presidential run.
THE
CITY identified 17 contributors who gave the max to de Blasio’s
presidential run in the first half of 2019 while donating $2,500 each to
his NY Fairness PAC. Meanwhile, the next public filings for de Blasio’s
third fundraising arm — his federal Fairness PAC — aren’t due until
July 31.
The
mayor has benefited from donors like Queens real estate developer
Michael Cheng, who gave $2,500 to the NY Fairness PAC on March 31. He
told THE CITY he believed he was supporting de Blasio’s potential
presidential run.
Around
the same time, he hosted a fundraiser at his Flushing home to raise
money for the mayor’s federal PAC. In June, he donated $2,800 to de
Blasio’s 2020 presidential committee, FEC records show.
“He’s doing great things for the city,” Cheng said of de Blasio.
De
Blasio campaign officials said they know of no donations to the state
PAC that were intended to
support the mayor’s consideration of a White
House run. They added the mayor had been clear in his fundraising
pitches at the time.
“The
mayor was consistent in his public and private comments: He wanted to
ensure the issues affecting working families were in the national
dialogue, and had not ruled out a run — but it would ultimately be a
family decision,“ said campaign spokeswoman Olivia Lapeyrolerie.
His "private comments"? Is that suppose to be a defensive take on Hillary Clinton's notorious philosophical trope on having public and private positions exposed in the Podesta emails by Wikileaks?
3 comments:
"I'm not a crook!" Oh sure. I say, "If that hat fits wear it."
Curious that they show the best privat ehosptial in Queens, yes, FLushing: https://patch.com/new-york/flushing-murray-hill/flushing-has-nycs-highest-uninsured-rate-no-public-hospitals
Deblasio was campaign manager for Hillary & Andrew
Post a Comment