The Queens Chronicle covers the landmarking hearing over Sunnyside Gardens:Landmarking Opinions From Both Sunny Sides
Meanwhile, the Crapper received letters from the pro-landmarkers who testified at the hearing.
Photo from Queens Chronicle
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The Crap-O-Sphere ("Crappy")
Artwork by Jerry Rotondi
The official mascot of Queens Crap
The Crap-O-Sphere ("Crappy")
"Let us dare to read, think, speak and write." - John Adams, 1765
Spotted a piece of Queens Crap in your community?
Write to us at QueensCrapper@gmail.com
Please note
Italicized passages and many of the photos come from other websites. The links to these websites are provided within the posts.
Why your neighborhood is full of Queens Crap
"The difference between dishonest and honest graft: for dishonest graft one worked solely for one's own interests, while for honest graft one pursued the interests of one's party, one's state, and one's personal interests all together." - George Washington Plunkitt
Willets Point United Against Eminent Domain Abuse
Artwork by Jerry Rotondi
Become a fan of Queens Crap on Facebook.
Sites that kick ass:
The above organizations are recognized by Queens Crap as being beneficial to the city as a whole, by fighting to preserve the history and character of our neighborhoods. They are not connected to this website and the opinions presented here do not necessarily represent the positions of these organizations.
The comments left by posters to this site do not necessarily represent the views of the blogger or webmaster.
Street or satellite shots used here are from Google Maps or Windows Live Local.
The comments left by posters to this site do not necessarily represent the views of the blogger or webmaster.
Street or satellite shots used here are from Google Maps or Windows Live Local.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(2365)
-
▼
April
(236)
- A fresh look at St. Saviour's
- Just who's driving?
- Revealing news quote of the month
- Home heating oil city's biggest pollutant
- You shook me all night long
- Your tax dollars at work, Albany edition
- Will Moondance make it to Queens?
- Golf club's a goner
- 'King of Queens' vacating his throne
- Mr. Ambition
- Hit the lights!
- Telling Claire off
- Reopening the Rockaway rail line
- Time to sink the stink!
- Douglaston day care nixed
- Crappy is blue and Tyler too
- Doorman debating decision
- Jamaica Home Scam
- Great Britain's great traffic debate
- Forest Park tennis courts in crappy shape
- Always Fast is sometimes too fast
- Fresh Meadows rally makes headlines
- Happy Arbor Day!
- Addressing repossession
- New blood center opens in LIC
- Bills for better building inspections
- Congestion pricing is Queens' hottest topic
- A 2nd Walk Through the Meadows, part 3
- Konichiwa, Katz!
- Building collapse at Atlantic Yards
- Forget Florida!
- The great abatement debate
- Seeing the light
- A different angle
- A 2nd Walk Through the Meadows, part 2
- GOP Dance Party
- Old plan to fill in the East River
- More on congestion suggestion
- Real Estate Ads in the Queens Chronicle
- Dim bulbs at City Hall
- Bringing affordable housing to the Brig
- A 2nd Walk Through the Meadows, part 1
- Is Pinky promoting park vandalism?
- Avella pool problem makes NY Times
- West Side wants lower density
- News from Nassau
- Sunnyside Gardens hearing
- A crap above, part 3
- Fresh Meadows rally report
- Dim bulbs at the Parks Department
- Jamaica Avenue letters
- Kosciuszko Bridge plan
- The long commute
- Green giant
- Crap in the yard, part 2
- Happy Earth Day
- New blog for central Queens
- Deadbeat landlord ordered to pay tenants
- Much ado about groceries
- Jamaica rezone rejected a second time
- QCC meets DOB
- They're in the money
- Concrete crap
- NYC names official flower
- Council Rides Over Pedicabs
- War over congestion pricing begins
- Pushing for new development
- Douglaston stores threatened
- New library for LIC
- Storm aftermath
- Flushing Commons letter of support
- Beat-the-clock crap
- Tale of the 2 boro tunnel
- Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens, Staten Island....
- Congestion suggestion
- The piano man of LIC
- Mayoral swap proposed
- Richmond Hill Republican Club sold!
- Fakin' it may be makin' us sick
- Avella and Gazette against water hike
- The Fort Totten Historic District, part 4
- Rally in Fresh Meadows this Saturday!
- And speaking of "Queens"...
- Congestion pricing considered by city
- Stringer says...
- The last photo of Spring!
- Now why did that fall down?
- Completely unbiased coverage
- Everybody Wang Chan tonight
- City sewer scandal
- Luxury hotel will replace hot sheets motel
- 29th photo of Spring
- Gehry building is crap
- Rivers as runways?
- The value of street trees
- Battle over meaningless piece of paper
- LI Building Moratorium
- Thar she blows!
- School of crap
- Mayor Poppins!
-
▼
April
(236)
Send submissions to:
queenscrapper@gmail.com
Include address of property and any other information you have about it.
All contributors will remain anonymous.
Include address of property and any other information you have about it.
All contributors will remain anonymous.
6 comments:
Bravo to Greater Astoria and Graziano.
True enough. Almost nothing was done to address this misinformation that was fed to the community (and tried to split it) by the clubhouse and press. Most importantly, why is there an unwillingness to get to the root of this and ensure that it will not happen again?
This is something that must be publicly and clearly discussed by groups like HDC and MAS, that is, if they are serious about assisting the borough of Queens in getting more such designations as they claim.
The Gardens are exceptional, and may win landmark distinction but only after a long fight. They should have been a shoo-in.
Any other community, even worthy of designation, will not stand a chance. This baggage assures that, as most of us suspect, only areas that have exceptional juice will get landmark designation.
Even worse, most of us get the impression from thet preservation community that this is a situation that is perfectly fine with them.
Who has the courage to address this problem?
Paul is missing an important additional point on why there are not many designations in Queens: the Manhattan-centric guys did almost nothing to 'get the word out' to the outer boroughs.
That is one of the reasons that four borough preservation group was formed.
It was sad to see a lack of support for Sunnyside Gardens by the other communities in Queens that are landmark districts.
If Sunnyside Gardens gets this distinction, will they follow suit and let other communities twist in the wind?
But let us not forget those people from Astoria, Forest Hills and Richmond Hill who DID testify on our behalf. THANKS!! If I left anyone out, my apologies.
hey, tony, cut the meaningless compliments and respond to the concerns.
Post a Comment