Note the anti-preservation bias in the newspaper headlines.
Hey, stop jerking people around. Go ahead, do a piece on about those folks in Jackson Heights, or Douglaston on landmarking. Interview the people living in a landmark community.
It is a crime for the newspapers to quote Mickeljohn as if she is just another person against landmarking.
How about her unparalleled access to the community board? How about the impact that her studies at Hunter have had on other neighborhoods (like Dutch Kills were a fire house closed and her study encouraged an enormous population increase.)
How about her harping on immigrant issues while making private negative remarks about them as rumor as it?
2 comments:
Note the anti-preservation bias in the newspaper headlines.
Hey, stop jerking people around. Go ahead, do a piece on about those folks in Jackson Heights, or Douglaston on landmarking. Interview the people living in a landmark community.
I dare you.
It is a crime for the newspapers to quote Mickeljohn as if she is just another person against landmarking.
How about her unparalleled access to the community board? How about the impact that her studies at Hunter have had on other neighborhoods (like Dutch Kills were a fire house closed and her study encouraged an enormous population increase.)
How about her harping on immigrant issues while making private negative remarks about them as rumor as it?
Post a Comment